Posts Tagged ‘Telegraph.co.uk’

The End of the Road for Barack Obama?

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

The British newspaper The Telegraph opines today that Obama may be coming to the end of his road as POTUS.

More and more often words like “desperation,” “in-fighting,” “demoralized” and “fractious” are being used to describe an administration that once held out hope to it’s partisans that it would be able to deliver the long hoped for socialist paradise where life would be easy, our every whim would be government’s command and it could all be paid for by taxing “the rich” who would be thrilled to see their hard earned wealth confiscated. After all, it was such a noble cause, who wouldn’t want to contribute more and more so that the masses could do less and less.

But then reality hit this feckless administration between the eyes.  Isn’t it funny how 15,000,000 unemployed Americans, jaw-dropping deficits and the endlessly proferred middle finger salute from the White House to the voters can galvanize public opinion?

With his poll numbers headed south and most of his policies with lopsided, upside down approve/disapprove ratios as well, Obama has demonstrated that he has spent his own political capital almost as fast as he is burning through our money with his ineffective, redistributive policies.

On March 18, we are told that Obama wants to have his “up or down vote” on the shop worn Health Care bill that has been drug through both Houses of Congress for the last year.  Whichever way the vote goes, IMHO Obama is done.  If it passes, it will be the middle finger to the voters and they will return the sentiment in November.  If it fails, it’s ” The Emperor Has No Clothes” and Obama’s opponents in both parties will move in to wrest power from him.  Obama has painted himself into the proverbial corner and it doesn’t look like their is any way for him to get out.  That being said, I don’t for a moment think we can let our guard down until this administration is politely ushered from the Oval Office back to being private citizens.  What a welcome relief that will be!

~~John Cronin~~

A thrashing of the Democrats in the mid-terms would not necessarily be the beginning of the end for Mr Obama: Bill Clinton was re-elected two years after the Republicans swept the House and the Senate in November 1994. But Mr Clinton was an operator in a way Mr Obama patently is not. His lack of experience, his dependence on rhetoric rather than action, his disconnection from the lives of many millions of Americans all handicap him heavily. It is not about whose advice he is taking: it is about him grasping what is wrong with America, and finding the will to put it right. That wasted first year, however, is another boulder hanging from his neck: what is wrong needs time to put right. The country’s multi-trillion dollar debt is barely being addressed; and a country engaged in costly foreign wars has a President who seems obsessed with anything but foreign policy – as a disregarded Britain is beginning to realise.

There are lessons from the stumbling of Mr Obama for our own country as we approach a general election. Vacuous promises of change are hostages to fortune if they cannot be delivered upon to improve the living conditions of a people. The slickness of campaigning that comes from a combination of heavy funding and public relations expertise does not inevitably translate into an ability to govern. There is no point a nation’s having the audacity of hope unless it also has the sophistication and the will to turn it into action. As things stand, Barack Obama and America under his leadership do not.

Read Complete Article at telegraph.co.uk

Wanted: short, fat white man to succeed Barack Obama

Sunday, March 7th, 2010

I wanted to repost this article from the British paper The Telegraph.Co.Uk because I thought it was an interesting take on our political situation from a European point of view. I am most assuredly not endorsing the opinion that our next American President be white, short, bald or any other physical characteristic.

Competent? Oh, yes. Conservative? Please.

~~John Cronin~~

As the glamour of Barack Obama fades, Americans are likely to turn to entirely different presidential candidates next time, argues Toby Harnden in Washington.

Toby Harnden’s American Way

You could call it the revenge of the ugly white guys. After electing a handsome sleek, biracial – and untested – man as President last time, Americans may well be ready for something entirely different in 2012.
Remember that you heard it here first: make way for the short, pudgy, balding white fellow who’s been there and got the scars – and the results – to prove it.
In many respects, Barack Obama was the ultimate candidate for the television age. He looked fantastic and sounded wonderful. He soared above politics and made people feel better about themselves.

Ability to get things done? Track record? Such petty considerations seemed beside the point in 2008 for Obama was the very culmination of history. It was almost as if the then Senator for Illinois symbolised the end of politics, the point at which the perfect candidate drew a line under grubby partisanship.

Now, Americans have woken up from that dream and are living with the hangover. Neither history nor politics ended when Obama’s ascended to the Oval Office. The recession is biting, unemployment is still hovering just below 10 per cent, the deficit is soaring and there is still gridlock in Washington.

Having elected two Senators as President and Vice-President for the first time since 1960, Americans are likely to look once again towards the more traditional stable for commanders-in-chief – the governor’s mansions.

As the Republican challengers to Obama begin to prepare the ground for their 2012 runs, two hitherto unlikely potential candidates are gaining support among party insiders.

Before Obama, neither would have had a prayer. Mitch Daniels, described by the “Washington Post” as Indiana’s “diminutive governor” sports what looks suspiciously like a combover.

He’s the kind of geek who seemed straight from central casting as head of the Office of Management and Budget under President George W. Bush when I interviewed him in 2001.

In what Americans for some unfathomable reason refer to as “the Hoosier state”, Daniels has been a quiet star, securing bipartisan support for a Healthy Indiana programme Indiana that provides health insurance for blue collar workers, cutting property taxes and turning an $800 billion deficit into a surplus.Daniels remarked to Ross Douthat of the New York Times that “I’ve never seen a president of the United States when I look in the mirror” (which instantly sets himself apart from all 100 Senators). Douthat duly noted that Daniels would be the baldest President since Dwight Eisenhower, who left office in 1961.

Haley Barbour has more hair than Daniels but isn’t much taller and if elected would be the most portly president since William Howard Taft, who occupied the White House from 1909 to 1913.

The Mississippi governor has a certain rumpled panache and Southern charm. I first bumped into him in a casino in his home state – where he later came to personify executive competence as he dealt masterfully with the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina while neighbouring Louisiana lurched towards catastrophe.

Barbour – who has a political brain second to none – has always been dismissed as a possible presidential contender. That’s partly because he has the perfect face for radio but also because he was a big-time lobbyist in Washington whose firm represented the tobacco industry.

But while Obama sanctimoniously instituted grand new rules to ban lobbyists from his administration and then immediately granted himself exceptions, at least with Barbour is up front about things. So could he really have a tilt at the White House? The door is ajar. “If you see me losing 40 pounds that means I’m either running or have cancer,” he quipped a fortnight ago..

All this could be a problem for the likes of Mitt Romney – a.k.a.
“Matinee Mitt” -
the buff, chiselled-jawed hunk who has not stopped running for President full-time since he lost out in 2008. And for Sarah Palin, who would be a celebrity candidate seeking to oust a celebrity president if she was pitted against Obama.

It might even make John McCain, who used to describe himself as “older than dirt, more scars than Frankenstein” when he was running against Obama, wonder whether he should resurrect that combover from the 1980s and have another go next time.I’m not going to predict who’ll succeed Obama. But I’ll wager it will be someone whiter, shorter, uglier, fatter and balder who won’t be able to deliver half as good a speech as the current commander-in-chief can.

Read More at telegraph.co.uk