Posts Tagged ‘Speaker Nancy Pelosi’

The Fat Lady is Singing

Monday, July 5th, 2010

There is an old cliche that says “the Opera isn’t over until the fat lady sings.” When you get the Boston Globe publishing opinions like the one excerpted below, she is on stage front and center and the performance is coming to a close.

~~John Cronin~~

the bostonglobe.com

Did you know this is supposed to be Obama’s “summer of recovery” for the economy? If we are an ailing patient, our condition has gone from stable to critical. The Dow, consumer confidence and housing are all headed in the wrong direction while unemployment and taxes are trending upwards. Not to worry. When Speaker Pelosi is dethroned and Senate Leader Harry Reid is defeated, we will see the Fall and Winter of Recovery.

Things to Remember in November 2010 #1

Saturday, May 15th, 2010

Remember this moment from the Health Care Summit when Pelosi mentioned the health care bill will “create 4 million jobs, 400,000 jobs almost immediately“?

Hey Pelosi! What Ever Happen to those 400,000 Health Care Jobs?

2005 Reconciliation Bad, Reconciliation 2010 Good #hcr

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

Lets just do a comparison, the Democrats opposed the so called Nuclear option in 2005 when the Bush Administration were trying the ‘Nuclear Option’, avoiding the Filibuster on Presidential Appointments.   Take a look at those that screamed the loudest.

Enter the year 2010, Obama justifies the majority vote, AKA  ’Reconciliation’ on Obamacare is OK.

And he got his way

WASHINGTON-The Senate completed its work on a package of amendments Thursday, forcing the House to vote once again on health care later in the day.

By a 56-43 vote, the Senate approved a reconciliation bill that amended the health care insurance overhaul bill it passed Christmas Eve. The vote was largely along party lines, as befits the entire health care debate—a fiery, partisan divide that has dominated Washington for more than a year.

Three Democrats voted “no” and one Republican was absent. Among the Democrats voting no was Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, who faces a tough re-election campaign.

READ MORE AT LA TIMES

And now the final word from Nancy Pelosi back in November 2006

Welcome to the most ethical congress ever implemented, that have now proved

“Think what we say, not what we do”.

If I was a lawyer, I would have won my case with these smoking guns.

Craig Edwards

If the Dust Settles

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

During my recent interview with Ari David, he mentioned that he perceived his generation as ‘Reagan / South Park Conservatives’.  It is with this reference in mind, that I make this point.

During South Park Episode 1205, a sub-plot saw the character ‘Cartman’ poses as a Latino high school teacher named “Mr. Cartmenez” at a under-preforming urban high school.  During this time, “Mr. Cartmenez”, installs the values of cheating to motivate, and improve the lives of his students.

LANGUAGE WARNING

Much like this example, the final scoreboard was 219 vote for Health Care Reform.  The final score does not count the kick backs, the arm twisting, or back room deals needed for the final vote.  Nor did it count the fact the bill being voted upon, was an incomplete Senate version, originally passed merely as a procedural vote pending a final amendment.  All that counted for Pelosi at the end of the day, was the 219 ‘Cartmanesque’ votes for Obamacare.

Now Obama and the Democrats have to sell (convince people), what they passed by force was worthwhile.  What you will instead see, will be the Democrats still attacking those raising reasonable concerns over Obamacare.  What Pelosi and her ilk showed, was their ignorance conquers all when emotional rationalization, and self justification are added.  When the dust settles, the middle class will see what Obamacare offers, and how much it will hinder them.  That is, if the dust can be allowed to settle.

Act 2: Orchestrated Distractions: And so starts the next thorny issue of public debate on Immigration Reform.  Any rage over Health Care Reform, or worrying about Obamacare will be pushed aside while a new battle is fought.  

Welcome to the tactic of  Orchestrated Distraction. Compared to the 12 months it took to pass Obamacare, November 2nd is a hard deadline they can’t get around.  So expect the push for Immigration Reform, Economic Reform, Cap & Trade to be rammed past the House and Senate. Even if Obama loses the Democrat controlled House in November, Obama gets everything he needed in time.   Even if the Senate loses a few Democrats in the Mid-terms, Obama can still pass everything he want in the Senate, by tweaking the rules and pushing for reconciliation with the 51 remaining Democrat votes.

The fact is this, Obama and Pelosi wont let the dust settle until they are finished implementing the most expensive social engineering program the world has ever seen.  After which, a few billion spent on Iraq, and Afghanistan for eight plus years of warfare will be viewed as a bargain.

Hold onto your hats folks, we’re not even close to the end.

Craig Edwards

Blue Dogs: They Said No to #HCR

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

THE VOTEMASTER : Even cursory inspection of the 34 House Democrats who voted no on the health-insurance bill shows that with a couple of exceptions, they come from very red districts measured by PVI, Obama’s percentage in 2008, and Kerry’s percentage in 2004.  Almost assuredly, they had Nancy Pelosi’s permission to vote no to save their own seats as soon as she was able to come up to 216 or 217 votes.  She ultimately got 219 votes to provide a little margin for safety and also to make it impossible for Republicans to attack any of the yes voters with: “If you had voted no, the bill would have been defeated. Here is the list sorted by PVI.”

SOURCE: electoral-vote.com

Five Reasons Not to Despair

Monday, March 22nd, 2010


By: Rich Lowry

If your heart didn’t sink when the Senate bill went over the top in the House last night and Democrats began chanting “Yes, we can” on the floor, you’re either not a conservative or inured to all disappointment. Conservatives will be temped to despair in the weeks ahead, as the magnitude of this defeat and its potential consequences sink in. But there are good reasons not to despair. Here are five:

Public opinion. Democrats were never able to convince the public of the merits of their reform — despite having the highest-profile platforms in American politics, including a president who wore out his teleprompter-festooned bully pulpit for a solid year. Liberals comforted themselves by saying that the bill gained popularity at the end. But look at the Wall Street Journal/NBC News polling on Obamacare. In September 2009, 39 percent thought it was a good idea, 41 percent a bad idea. In January, it was 33 a good idea, 46 a bad idea. The latest poll had it at 36-48 — basically flat from the beginning of the year. Fox News polling had the bill at 38 percent approval and 48 percent disapproval in mid-September 2009, then at 34-57 in December, and 35-55 in its latest survey — again, essentially flat. The public has displayed an irreducible reservoir of common sense throughout the debate, which will be something crucial to draw on during the fights to come.

Structured so can it be overturned. The classic play in entitlement politics is to hook people on the benefits, making repeal impossible and growth inevitable. Obamacare is built so the major benefits, the subsidies, don’t kick in for years. This is part of the fiscal ruse — if the benefits kicked in immediately, Democrats would have exceeded their politically dictated ceiling of $1 trillion in official costs over the first ten years. The delay means there’s time to reverse key aspects of the bill before they take effect.

There’s no doubt that this will be difficult. Democrats have created a fact on the ground in the form of the bill, which puts the power of inertia on their side. Republicans will have to defeat an incumbent president in 2012, never easy. And they will have to offer alternative policy ideas that carry the day. If the odds are against them, all of this is still within the realm of the possible. One way to look at it is that Obama and Nancy Pelosi won the debate within the Democratic caucus over whether to pass a maximalist bill. But they haven’t yet won the debate in the country, which will rumble on.

A moment of clarity. Democrats generally win national elections by posing as moderates. In 2006, congressional Democrats sounded like a reasonable alternative to a corrupt Republican party that was losing a major war. In 2008, Obama usually portrayed himself as a moderate post-partisan; if the nature of Obama’s governance had been blatantly forecast back then, he might not have won, despite the financial crisis, the unpopularity of Bush, and the weakness of McCain’s campaign.

It’s a long time until 2012, but the health-care bill and the way it passed will make it much harder for the president to obscure his ideological commitments. There’s even less reason than before for anyone to misunderstand what Obama and his Democratic party are fundamentally about.

The truth will out. Obama has been saying things about his bill that are untrue: It won’t make premiums do down; it won’t control costs; it won’t allow everyone who likes their current insurance arrangements to keep them. These false representations may well make the bill more unpopular rather than less after passage.

Democrats learned with the stimulus that it’s not much fun to defend a law that they vastly oversold prior to passage. They’ll have exactly the same experience with health-care reform. The legislation on which they’ve staked so much will not withstand its first contact with reality.

The GOP has been better than expected. I remember listening to a Republican congressional leader answer questions about health care at an off-the-record event back in early 2009, and feeling profoundly depressed. He sounded as if he’d already given up. It’s been a very pleasant surprise how Republicans rose to the occasion over the last year. The bill sank in public opinion mostly of its own weight, but Republicans were relentless in their critiques and held together to oppose it. If Mitch McConnell hadn’t held his caucus together, Scott Brown wouldn’t have become the 41st vote and almost brought the bill down. At the health-care summit, Republicans offered an alternative vision for an entirely different direction in reform and found a star to articulate it in Paul Ryan. They couldn’t stop the large Democratic majorities in the House and the Senate from passing the bill, but the way they performed provides hope for the ongoing debate.

None of the above means we should minimize what happened yesterday. It’s a severe blow. But if we are to recover, we can’t despair.

– Rich Lowry is editor of National Review.

READ MORE AT NRO

Steny, We Have to Get to 217……

Sunday, March 21st, 2010


OVERHEARD: Walking into Capitol this morning on phone, Speaker Pelosi tells Hoyer: ‘Steny, we have to get to 217. None of these members wants to be the deciding vote’… Developing…

Exclusive: House Minority Leader John Boehner on the Health-Care Vote

Friday, March 19th, 2010

EXCLUSIVE — Rep. John Boehner (R., Ohio), the House minority leader, tells National Review Online that as of late Thursday afternoon, Democratic leadership “still doesn’t have the votes” to pass their health-care bill, and that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) is “prepared to sacrifice her members, and her speakership, so that she can plant the flag of universal health care in the ground.” Boehner says this weekend will be a waiting game — “If the speaker doesn’t have 216 votes locked down, she will not go to the floor. If she’s short, she knows that there is no way she can pick up two or three votes on the floor.” On that same point, he admits that “if this comes to the floor, it’s already over . . . though I still don’t know how she can get there [to 216]. . . . I’d never put myself in this box.”

“The right is mad, the middle is mad, and the left is mad,” Boehner says. “They’ve made a calculation: They know they won’t get the right or middle, so they saying to their members that they need their left, because if they lose the left, their base will sit home. The president is staying in town because he knows the left will kill him if he’s not here to help.”

Boehner adds that Pelosi has “made a big mistake by talking about this gimmicky way to pass this without having a real vote.” President Obama, he says, “has put all of his marbles, literally all of his marbles, on jamming through something the people don’t want” and has “arrogantly misjudged this entire issue from the start.” Here’s why, Boehner says: “The Left sees this as their best opportunity in 50 years to put their stamp on the direction of this country.”

Boehner believes that abortion will be the key complication for on-the-fence Democrats in the final hours. “I’ve always thought that this would be the issue,” he says. “This is public funding for abortion. They know it can’t be fixed. There just aren’t the votes in the Senate.” He says he respects pro-life congressman Bart Stupak (D., Mich.) for holding firm, but cautions that he “never thought that Stupak could hold ten to twelve votes.”

Boehner says there will be major political consequences for pro-life Democrats who break from the Stupak bloc. “Take [Rep.] Steve Driehaus, for example,” he says. “He may be a dead man. He can’t go home to the west side of Cincinnati. The Catholics will run him out of town.”

If Boehner is “lucky enough to become speaker,” he says he plans to work to repair the “damage to the institution” that the health-care debate has caused over the past year. “It will be different,” he pledges. “We’d run this different than how it is run today, and from how my predecessors ran it. We’ve got to make this government smaller and less costly. There are big problems to address. It’s been shocking how people have been paying attention to the process, and we’ve noticed. We’ll repeal this — we’ll put a bill on the floor to take out the Medicare cuts, the tax increases, and the individual mandates.”

A final message for the weekend? “Kill the bill, just kill the bill,” he says. To do that, he says the NRCC is running a “Code Red” project, robocalls are going out, and members are going on local radio shows and hosting telephone town halls — in Democratic districts. “It’s all targeted,” he says.

Read Article at NRO

SOLID PRINCIPLES PODCAST: Episode 26

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

podcast-26.jpg

SOLID PRINCIPLES PODCAST: Episode 26

The Pursuit of Rubber Stamp Russ: When appearing at a fund raiser for Rep. Russ Carnahan of Missouri, House Speaker Pelosi classified Carnahan as ‘Not a High Maintenance Type’. This gave Republican Congressional candidate Ed Martin the idea to now refer to Carnahan as, ‘Rubber Stamp Russ. As part of the 2010 Contenders Series, Solid Principles spoke to Ed Martin on his challenge for the 3rd Congressional District of Missouri, and matters relating to the 2010 Mid-Terms.

DOWNLOAD, add the RSS Feed or get it from iTunes / Stitcher

U.S. Senator Scott Brown Delivers Weekly Republican Address

Saturday, March 13th, 2010

Scott Brown has delivered the Weekly Republican Address and he takes the opportunity to warn America once again of the disastrous Health Care Bill that the Dems appear willing to end their careers with. I supported Scott and made phone calls into Massachusetts for this very reason. Scott said he would vote to stop this toxic bill and he continues his fight against it.

I am asking our readers to help Scott by going over to dickmorris.com for the list of swing lawmakers that he has listed there and to call their offices all through this coming week, right up to the start of voting. My understanding is that Pelosi has scheduled the vote for the 18th. I know that information changes at warp speed these days, but that is the latest date that I am aware of.

Let’s take the fight to these people and let them know they will face the electoral wrath of the voters this November if they continue to defy us.

Thanks in advance.

~~John Cronin~~

Politico Breaking News: Health Care Vote Next Week

Friday, March 12th, 2010

Breaking News:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told her members Friday to brace themselves for a climatic health care vote as early as next week, warning them to clear their schedules for next weekend and promising to stay in session until the landmark vote, people present at the meeting told POLITICO. President Barack Obama has postponed an overseas trip until March 21, and Pelosi said, “I am delighted the president will be here for the passage of the bill. It will be historic.”

For more updates visit politico.com

Obama delivers health care pitch in St. Charles, St. Louis

Thursday, March 11th, 2010


By:  Jake Wagman, Blythe Bernhard, Mark Schlinkmann

President Barack Obama brought his health care road show to the St. Louis area Wednesday, announcing a crackdown on waste and fraud in hopes of persuading a gridlocked Congress to pass sweeping health insurance reform.

After delivering a speech in St. Charles, Obama appeared at a downtown St. Louis fundraiser for U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo. Hundreds of protesters appeared in St. Charles and in downtown St. Louis, many to express opposition to the health care plan.

Obama’s speech in a stuffy gymnasium at St. Charles High School, his second health care address in three days, is part of a White House push to take the debate from the halls of Congress directly to voters, allowing the administration to frame the issue in its own terms.

Earlier in the week, Obama used the prospect of rising insurance premiums to make the case for health care reform. On Wednesday, in front of an invitation-only crowd in St. Charles, he offered a new angle, announcing additional oversight of federal programs.

Obama was joined on stage by McCaskill, a former state auditor whom the president praised as a person who “just pinches pennies.”

“Washington is a place where tax dollars are often treated like Monopoly money,” Obama said, “where waste — even billions of dollars in waste — is accepted as the price of doing business.”

Obama signed an executive memo Wednesday calling for greater use of “payment recapture audits,” which allows federal government departments to hire private auditors to find taxpayer funds paid in error or through fraud. The auditors can be paid based on the amount of improper payments they reclaim, providing incentive to root out waste.

The audits could be used to prevent overpayment in Medicare, Medicaid and, potentially, any new or expanded health care program.

The audit plan, which has bipartisan support, comes as Obama attempts to pick certain Republican ideas that could make his health care package more palatable across the aisle. Obama also expressed interest in a proposal from U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., to use undercover investigations to combat fraud.

The White House says expanded use of payment recapture audits could return $2 billion in taxpayer money over the next three years.

Hours before Obama’s speech, as many as 2,000 people gathered for a Republican rally at the St. Charles Convention Center.

“I have a question that I respectfully ask of my president,” Missouri Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder said. “What part of ‘no’ don’t you understand?”

Kinder and several GOP state legislators spoke in person at the event, while others delivered remarks from Washington via videoconferencing, displayed by a large TV screen. All were well-received by the enthusiastic crowd.

“This is so much more fun than watching C-SPAN, isn’t it?” remarked the announcer, local radio host Jamie Allman.

Among the long-distance speakers was the event’s organizer, U.S. Rep. Todd Akin of Town and Country, whose 2nd District includes St. Charles, and U.S. Rep. John Shimkus of Collinsville.

Akin called Obama’s bill “a threat from within and a danger from Washington, D.C.” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., also was taken to task by speakers.

“This is Pelosi versus the people, and we stand with the people,” Kinder said, adding that Democratic measures would turn the country “into something that is unrecognizable.”

“But we the people will have the final say,” he added.

Obama’s visit to St. Charles offered an opportunity to refocus attention on health care and attempt to blunt the opposition.

“The plan that I’ve put forward … incorporates the best ideas of Democrats and Republicans, even though the Republicans have a hard time acknowledging it,” he said, calling it a “common sense approach to protecting you from insurance company abuses and saving you money.”

He said the bill would force insurance companies to cover pre-existing conditions and ban insurers from dropping customers when they get sick. It would also offer a pool for individuals and small businesses that the president said would lead to lower premiums for many.

Obama — with sleeves rolled up and no jacket in the tightly packed gym — spoke with teachers and staff from the high school who were standing behind him. Most of his comments were met with applause from the invited audience of local officials and party activists.

Frank Scimo, 64, of Ballwin, said he helped organize a group of about 100 people outside the high school who came to support the president and health care reform.

“I believe the people should have health insurance,” he said. He pointed to his stepdaughter, who he said was denied insurance because of a pre-existing problem with her knees.

Amy Smoucha, an organizer with the nonprofit Jobs with Justice, said she left the speech feeling confident in the president and his plan. “I’m happy to see he is so sincere about fixing the health care system,” said Smoucha, 42.

Even those who don’t agree with Obama’s approach on health care came to catch a glimpse of the commander-in-chief.

“I am sincerely honored that the president of the United States has chosen to come to our county and my hometown,” said St. Charles County Executive Steve Ehlmann, a Republican. “I’m just not buying what he’s selling.”

Obama has asked Congress to deliver an “up or down” vote on health care by the end of next week. Each branch of Congress has approved its version of a health care reform bill, but, in order to take effect, lawmakers must agree to one identical bill.

If the administration musters the 216 House votes needed to pass Senate legislation, the next step would be the so-called reconciliation process, under which Congress hammers out a final version to submit to the Senate for an up-or-down vote requiring a simple majority.

Polls show split public opinion on the direction of health care. Outgoing U.S. Sen. Christopher “Kit” Bond, R-Mo., said the president’s speeches in St. Charles and elsewhere — he was in Philadelphia on Monday and will be in Ohio next week — are an attempt by Obama to use oratorical skills to sell a plan Americans don’t want.

“He is trying to cram it through. He has shown that he is not listening,” Bond, who is retiring when his term ends this year, said. “He thinks if he talks very slowly, we will understand.”

U.S. Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., who is running for Bond’s seat, proffered a more measured approach to health care, endorsing incremental steps — such as limiting lawsuits and allowing patients to shop across state lines for insurance.

“Go back to the things that everybody believes would change the system. Do a handful of those in the next couple of years. Then see what needs to be done,” Blunt said.

This week’s visit was Obama’s third trip to the St. Louis area since he took office last year.

At Wednesday’s speech at St. Charles High, Obama was joined by several local Democratic officials. One noticeable absence was Democratic Senate hopeful and Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan, who has attempted to distance herself from Obama. Carnahan, the state’s chief security regulator, was in Washington on Wednesday talking to lawmakers about financial reform.

A White House official said Wednesday that Carnahan’s visit to Washington was planned before the president’s trip here was scheduled, and that Carnahan has already asked to appear with the president at an event soon.

McCaskill, who flew to St. Louis with Obama on Air Force One, did not have to wait.

On Wednesday evening at the Renaissance Grand hotel downtown, Obama headlined a fundraiser for McCaskill, who is not up for re-election until 2012. Tickets ranged from $25 for standing room to $25,000 for dinner and a photo with the president.

Outside, several hundred protesters representing a wide spectrum of viewpoints stood on nearby street corners, chanting slogans and yelling at one another through bullhorns.

A large group of local Tea Party activists gathered on one corner, while a smaller group of Obama supporters set up shop on another corner. Across the street was a mixed bag of protesters and activists who seemed less vocal.

Rose Green, 70, had never seen a sitting president in person before watching Obama talk Wednesday downtown.

“A president, a black president. It’s history, and I’m a part of it,” Green said. “It was worth the wait.”

Related Reading at STLtoday

Stupid Comments with Pelosi #1

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

Watch on You Tube

SOLID PRINCIPLES PODCAST: Episode 25

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

podcast25.jpg

SOLID PRINCIPLES PODCAST: Episode 25

Mulvaney vs. The Blue Lap Dog: How did South Carolina’s ‘Blue Dog’ Democrat John Spratt, suddenly turn into Nancy Pelosi’s lap dog? Now this long term serving Congressman, faces the race of his life from the conservative Republican State Senator, Mick Mulvaney this November. As part of the 2010 Contenders Series, Solid Principles spoke to Mulvaney on his pursuit for representing the 5th Congressional District of South Carolina.

DOWNLOAD, add the RSS Feed or get it from iTunes / Stitcher

O’Connor: Is Nancy Pelosi radioactive or retiring?

Monday, March 8th, 2010

By Colleen O’Connor

Who can forget the images?

Just over a year ago.

Hillary Clinton, defeated in her quest to become the first woman elected President of the U.S.— returning to the U.S. Senate for an agonizing and awkward reunion with her colleagues — and suffering the embrace of Sen. Ted Kennedy, who endorsed the young, inexperienced, junior Senator from Illinois, Barack Obama.

Two years earlier, Nancy Pelosi — triumphant in her quest to become the first woman Speaker of the House — smiled broadly, as she lifted the ceremonial gavel into the air, and surrounded herself with a podium full of Members’ children and grandchildren.

The Democratic House roared its approval for a woman who promised to “drain the swamp” of corruption and return “transparency” to the legislative process.

In fact, she promised to deliver the “most ethical Congress” in history.

Pelosi and Clinton: the iconic, and contrasting images of powerful women in victory and defeat.

That didn’t last long.

Read more at SDNN.com

Related Listening: Colleen O’Connor interview Solid Principles Podcast 19

Colleen O’Connor: Meg Whitman could win

Sunday, March 7th, 2010


[Editor's note:  This column was written June 2009.  It is as up to date in it's analysis as if it was written this weekend]

By:  Colleen O’Connor

Few believe that any Republican can win the governorship of one of the country’s most dependably Democratic states—California.

I beg to differ. It could happen.

Everything seems to be in the Democrats favor;
• Lopsided party registration; ( 44.6 percent = Democrats; 31.1 percent = Republicans, 20 percent = Declines to State; and 4.4 percent = Other , i.e., American Independent and Green Parties);
• Seasoned political talent for contenders (San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, Attorney General and former Governor Jerry Brown, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigoso;
• Dominance in the state legislature; (both controlled by Democratic majorities);
• A popular President Obama; a legendary fundraiser at the helm of the state party apparatus (former Representative and State Senator, John Burton) as well as home to House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi.

How much more political firepower can one party have?

How can the Democrats possibly lose to a Republican newcomer like Meg Whitman?

And who is she, anyway?

Whitman is the former CEO of the on-line auction site, eBAY. She is herself, New York-born, Princeton and Harvard educated, a billionaire, 52 years of age, and currently the recipient of flattering stories in several business news magazines. She is the protégé of former Republican Presidential candidate and Massachusetts Governor, Mitt Romney, and a campaign adviser to Republican Presidential nominee, John McCain—both of whom have already endorsed her, thereby almost clearing the field of all but one other billionaire primary opponent.

So, she has the Republican heavyweights supporting her bid, enough personal income to fund her own campaign, and some training time on the campaign trail.

Jerry Brown takes her seriously enough to ridicule her campaign as, “I ran a business. I can buy a campaign. I have zero experience in government. I want to take on the most difficult state job in America. Therefore, make me governor.’ That’s her campaign,” he says.

As a Jeffersonian Republican, (”that government governs best that governs least”), Whitman wants to “run California like a business” — hardly new. However, she opposed all of Schwarzenegger’s ballot budget propositions, thus siding with the popular outcome.

Still, how does she win the governorship?

Easy. Gov. Schwarzenegger can win it for her.

As Schwarzenegger continues to propose hugely unpopular, even if necessary, cuts to the state budget, the seething anger among all classes of the electorate will be primed for another recall election. High-pitched squabbling over a seemingly intractable budget has most of California’s voters on edge. Add more job losses, plant closings, and falling state revenues, and the stew thickens. The Republicans sense this.

In fact, five recall petitions against the Governor have already been registered with the California Secretary of State’s office. Money and misery love petition signings.

Together they may produce an encore performance of our last recall election—the one that ousted the unpopular Democratic Governor, Gray Davis, and elected the Republican Governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger,—with less than 50 percent of the vote.

In a recall scenario, the electorate only needs a majority of “YES” votes to oust the current Governor, and a simple plurality of votes for a candidate to get elected!

Put simply, if all the current candidates stay in the race on the Democratic side (a serious possibility) and the only woman and Republican candidate is Meg Whitman (also a very real possibility), she only needs approximately 38 percent of likely voters to win!

Ironically, the key to a Republican victory for Meg Whitman, is an instant replay of Schwarzenegger’s original win.

Republicans are shrewd enough chess players to attempt this checkmate move again. As long as the Democrats are preoccupied fighting The Terminator and his budget cuts, while battling on behalf of their constituents who about to lose their state funding, the Republicans are free to gather petition signatures, and try another stealth win in an otherwise difficult state.

Add to this dynamic, the rising tide of “independent” voters, Ms. Whitman’s appeal to women (many of whom are still irritated at the rather shabby treatment of both Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin, and want some history making news of their own) and you can easily put together a perfect storm that leads to Meg Whitman occupying the Governor’s mansion.

Read Complete Article at SDNN.com

Related Listening: Colleen O’Connor interview Solid Principles Podcast 19

Rep. Charles Rangel to temporarily quit key tax post

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010



By: Paul Kane and Perry Bacon, Jr.

Rep. Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday that he would temporarily step down as chairman of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, days after being was admonished for breaking House rules by accepting corporate-financed travel.

Appearing briefly before reporters but taking no questions, the 20-term incumbent from Harlem said he would take a break from the chairmanship because he didn’t want the ethics probe into his activities to affect fellow Democrats running in next fall’s House elections.

“My chairmanship is bringing so much attention to the press,” said Rangel, 79. ” . . . In order to avoid my colleagues having to defend me during their elections, I have this morning sent a letter” asking House Speaker Nancy Pelosi “to grant me a leave of absence until such time as the ethics committee completes its work.”

Read more at washingtonpost.com

Pelosi: Health Care Reform Will Create Jobs

Friday, February 26th, 2010

Stop me if you think you’ve heard this one before…

Obama to spell out new healthcare plan

Saturday, February 20th, 2010

The Night of the Living Dead

By:  Donna Smith

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President Barack Obama is expected to publish his healthcare plan as early as Sunday or Monday, combining features of the two Democratic bills passed by the Senate and House of Representatives, congressional aides and healthcare advocates said on Friday.

The administration’s bill will aim to jump-start the stalled healthcare overhaul and comes just days ahead of a planned televised White House summit with congressional Republicans, who are calling on Democrats to scrap the bills and start over with a far less sweeping proposal.

Democrats are struggling to push healthcare legislation over the finish line in the face of sagging public support and solid Republican opposition bolstered by recent election victories in Massachusetts, Virginia and New Jersey.

The legislation the White House will post on its website is expected to reflect common ground negotiated over the past several weeks by House and Senate Democratic leaders.

Those agreements are likely to be combined as a privileged budget reconciliation bill, which only needs a simple 51-vote majority to pass the 100-member Senate instead of the 60-vote supermajority that has become routine in the Senate and gives Republicans power to block the healthcare bill.

“I believe that’s the path we are going to take,” a senior congressional Democratic aide said.

But it is not clear, even to congressional Democrats, what the White House will include in its legislation and whether Obama will try to add proposals aimed at attracting at least some Republican support.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi have not signed off on any final agreement, several Democratic aides have said.

Read More at Reuters/Yahoo

Rasmussen: Health Care Reform Poll

Saturday, February 13th, 2010

Bulletin…….To: Congressional Republicans…….Re: Health Care Summit……Source: Rasmussen Reports……61% of U.S. voters say Congress should scrap that plan and start all over again.

In other words, you Pubbies have the backing of a supermajority of the voters to tell Obama, Reid, Pelosi and Baucus you want to wipe the slate clean and start over on Health Insurance Reform.

This time the process will be open to the health care industry and to the public, which will include the proceedings being televised on C-Span……just like you said it would during the election, Mr. President….before you excluded the Republicans.

~~John Cronin~~

RASMUSSEN REPORTS

President Obama this week called for a televised bipartisan summit to get his health care reform plan back on track, but 61% of U.S. voters say Congress should scrap that plan and start all over again.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds just 28% who think it is better to build on the health care plan that has been working its way through the House and Senate.
Support for and opposition to the existing plan remain at the same levels they’ve been at since just after Thanksgiving.

Only 35% of voters believe Congress should pass health care reform before the upcoming midterm elections anyway. Fifty-four percent (54%) say Congress should wait until voters select new congressional representatives in November.

It’s interesting to note that in a separate survey earlier this week 63% of voters said, generally speaking, it would be better for the country if most incumbents in Congress were defeated this November. Just 27% now believe their current congressman is the best person for the job.