Posts Tagged ‘Mike Huckabee’

Mitt Romney Backs Bill McCollum and a Dozen Other Florida Republicans

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

sunshinestatenews.com

On Monday former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, best known for his stab at the 2008 Republican presidential nomination and widely considered a candidate for the GOP nod in 2012, backed Attorney General Bill McCollum for governor and offered endorsements for other Sunshine State Republicans.

Under the auspices of Free and Strong America, a leadership PAC backed by Romney, the former presidential candidate praised McCollum for his commitment to conservative values.

“Bill McCollum has a record as a principled conservative leader who has always fought for lower taxes, less government and traditional values, and I’m proud to support him as Florida’s next governor,” said Romney. “It’s time to return true conservative leadership to the Florida governor’s mansion. Bill’s plan to create more than 500,000 new jobs, cut bureaucratic regulation and attract more businesses is exactly what is needed to jump start Florida’s economy.”

McCollum is currently engaged in a surprisingly tight contest with health care executive Rick Scott, who has posed a serious conservative challenge to the attorney general. A poll by Quinnipiac University released last week showed Scott crushing McCollum in the race, with a 13-point lead.

Romney, who placed a strong second in the Florida primary in January 2008 behind eventual nominee U.S. Sen. John McCain, is not the only former — and perhaps future — Republican presidential candidate getting active in Florida politics. Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, who battled Romney for the support of conservatives, has also been very active in Florida politics with Huck PAC, his own leadership political action committee.

Besides McCollum, Romney backed two other Republican candidates for statewide office – Senate President Jeff Atwater, R-North Palm Beach, who is running for state CFO, and U.S. Rep. Adam Putnam’s bid to be the next agriculture and consumer commissioner. Romney did not offer an endorsement in the close battle for the Republican attorney general nomination.

Romney also backed three Florida Republican congressional incumbents — Ander Crenshaw, Connie Mack and Tom Rooney. Romney had earlier backed former House Speaker Marco Rubio for the U.S. Senate.

Romney also backed candidates for the Legislature. These included incoming Senate President Mike Haridopolos, R-Merritt Island, and incoming House Speaker Dean Cannon, R-Winter Park. He also backed Republican Party of Florida (RPOF) Chairman Sen. John Thrasher, R-Jacksonville, for another term in the Senate. Romney will be at a campaign kickoff for Thrasher in Jacksonville on Tuesday.

Besides backing the current Republican leadership in the state, Romney also endorsed Will Weatherford, R-Wesley Chapel, who has been designated to serve as speaker after Cannon.

Romney also backs Rep. Anitere Flores, R-Miami, who is running for the state Senate seat that is currently held by Sen. Alex Villalobos, R-Miami. Romney announced that he is supporting Rep. Jennifer Carroll, R-Fleming Island, for re-election. And he is supporting former Speaker Pro Tem Dennis Baxley, who is looking to return to the House, running for the seat that Rep. Kurt Kelly, R-Ocala, is vacating to run for Congress.

The PAC is offering financial backing to the party and some of the candidates that Romney endorsed. The PAC sent $5,000 to the RPOF, $2,500 to both Crenshaw and Rooney, and $250 to both Atwater and Putnam.

“The people of Florida are fortunate to have so many strong candidates who are committed to getting our economy back on track,” said Romney. “It is essential that we elect leaders who are committed to creating a pro-growth and pro-jobs environment, and that is why I am pleased to endorse these candidates today.”

Reach Kevin Derby at kderby@sunshinestatenews.com  or at (850) 727-0859

Primaries a Win for Sarah Palin, Mitt Romney

Friday, June 11th, 2010


If Sarah Palin and Mitt Romney decide to run for president in 2012, they’ll have some powerful friends in the early states that are key to winning the GOP nomination.

Mike Huckabee? Not so much.

All of it is part of the presidential election fallout from Tuesday’s primaries in Iowa and South Carolina, two states so pivotal in the GOP nomination process that even their off-year state elections are carefully examined for their relevance to the next presidential race.

Both Palin and Romney backed the first-place finishers in the high-profile governors races in the two states—former GOP Gov. Terry Branstad in Iowa and state Rep. Nikki Haley in South Carolina—endorsements that are likely to pay dividends in the event either Republican runs for president in 2012.

Huckabee, on the other hand, bet on the wrong horses—he used his political action committee to invest heavily in the losing campaigns of businessman Bob Vander Plaats in Iowa and Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer in South Carolina, two candidates who finished some distance behind on Tuesday.

Branstad’s victory and Haley’s first-place finish—she’ll face Rep. Gresham Barrett in a June 22 runoff—represent a subtle but possibly important shift in the conservative grassroots, which powered Huckabee in 2008 to an improbable win in Iowa and a strong second place showing in South Carolina. Romney, meanwhile, finished a disappointing second in Iowa in 2008 despite spending considerable time and money to build a commanding organizational lead in the traditional kick-off state.

The most obvious signals Tuesday were that GOP voters who showed up in South Carolina are comfortable with a woman heading the statewide ticket—Haley would be the state’s first female governor, if elected—and that Iowa Republicans preferred a more moderate conservative over a harder right Christian conservative.

For Palin, who is already popular with conservative activists in Iowa and South Carolina, her support for the GOP nominees—who serve as the de facto party leaders in the two states—means she now has important allies in exactly the right places for 2012.

“I think those endorsements help Palin more than they actually help the candidates themselves,” said GOP strategist John Feehery. “She now has friends for life and she has created the perception that she has her finger on the pulse of the Republican Party, which gives her more credibility as the party spokesperson.”

Perhaps of more consequence for a potential Palin presidential bid, the former Alaska governor now has access to a network of staffers and activists with recent winning experience in winning contested statewide races.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0610/38410.html

#ixzz0qY270Tx3

Mitt Romney to Endorse Rubio Over Crist

Friday, April 16th, 2010

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney will endorse Marco Rubio over Gov. Charlie Crist in Florida’s Republican Senate primary more than two years after Crist helped crush Romney’s presidential aspirations by endorsing rival John McCain.

Romney plans to announce the endorsement Saturday and campaign with Rubio in Tampa on Monday, according to a Romney adviser who asked to remain anonymous because the official announcement has not been made.

Romney is the third major 2008 presidential candidate to endorse Rubio. Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee have also endorsed the former House speaker. Giuliani, who endorsed earlier this month, was also counting on a Florida victory during the 2008 campaign and now says Crist backed out of a promised endorsement.

Crist and Rubio both sought Romney’s endorsement, the adviser said, but Romney believes Rubio has a stronger conservative record and is an idea-driven leader. Romney was also disappointed that Crist vetoed a teacher merit-pay bill this week that was a high priority for Republican lawmakers and former Gov. Jeb Bush.

Romney’s PAC is contributing the maximum $5,000 allowed to Rubio’s campaign. In 2006, Romney flew to Tallahassee as head of the Republican Governors Association with a $1 million check to help Crist’s run for governor.

In 2008, Romney and McCain were in a tight battle for Florida with Romney slightly ahead in polls leading up to the primary. Crist endorsed McCain just three days ahead of the election and some political observers believe it was enough to give McCain the win, which he used to build momentum and capture the nomination.

Romney is often mentioned as a potential 2012 presidential candidate. By backing Rubio, a favorite of conservatives, Romney could endear himself to Republican voters who were uncomfortable with his moderate stands on abortion and gay rights when he ran for office in Massachusetts.

The Rubio campaign said it would not comment on the endorsement until after it’s made. The Crist campaign didn’t immediately respond to e-mails seeking comment.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/16/mitt-romney-to-endorse-ru_n_540936.html

Southern Republican Leadership Conference kicks off 2012 race

Friday, April 9th, 2010


The eyes of the Republican political world will turn to New Orleans today as a cavalcade of GOP leaders, wanna-be leaders and national reporters will be in the Big Easy for the Southern Republican Leadership Conference.

The event is widely being cast as the first “cattle call” of the 2012 Republican presidential primary fight although the absence of former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty and former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee makes it slightly less star-packed.

Still, during the three-day event, which begins this evening, a number of the brightest lights in the party from former Alaska governor Sarah Palin to Texas Gov. Rick Perry to Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour — among many, many others — will address the crowd.

C-SPAN, the Fix’s favorite television network, will be broadcasting many of the speeches live and we’ll be watching, listening and blogging closely. The Post will also have a strong contingent on the ground with Dan Balz, Amy Gardner and new addition Dave Weigel filing regular updates.

In the meantime, here’s a few storylines to keep an eye on:

1) Embattled Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele is scheduled to attend. He’ll be the talk of the gathering, the first time a large group of GOP officials and operatives have gotten together since the Voyeur controversy. How does Steele handle himself? And do any prominent Republicans break script and call on the chairman to step aside?2) From the second she arrives at SRLC to the moment she leaves, Palin will be under a microscope. (She is scheduled to speak Friday afternoon.) Of late, Palin has shown signs — her Democratic target list for 2010, for example — that she is willing to play nice with the party establishment. Does she maintain it with her speech?

3) Without Romney, Huckabee and Pawlenty in attendance, there is an opportunity for someone — Perry, Barbour, Indiana Rep. MIke Pence — to stand out and draw a bit of buzz coming out of the event. Who seizes that opportunity?

4) There will be a straw poll at SRLC. Texas Rep. Ron Paul’s supporters have pledged to deliver another straw poll win for their man — following on the heels of his victory at CPAC in February. If that happens, look for some within the party — including the leading 2012 candidates — to push for an end to these sorts of straw polls.

Read more @…….

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/20100408-southern-republican-leadership-conference.html?wprss=thefix

Poll shows majority thinks Obama will not be re-elected

Friday, April 2nd, 2010

A new survey released by CNN shows that 54% of those polled think President Barack Obama would not be re-elected in 2012 if he decides to run for a second term.

Of the 1,030 adult Americans — including 953 registered voters — interviewed on March 19-21 by Opinion Research Corporation, only 44% predicted that Obama would be re-elected; 2% had no opinion.

The poll, released by CNN Thursday night, also showed respondents almost evenly split between Obama and a Republican candidate if the presidential election were held today. Forty-eight percent of all the respondents said they would vote for Obama and 46% for a Republican. Of the registered voters participating, Obama and a Republican candidate would be tied, with each getting 47% of those surveyed.

CNN Polling Director Keating Holland noted that while the survey results don’t look good for Obama, former President Bill Clinton fared even worse in a CNN poll taken at the same time during his first term, scoring 15 points lower than an unnamed Republican challenger. Clinton, of course, went on to be re-elected by an even bigger percentage of voters in 1996 than he’d won in his first election.

Looking at the Republican field of potential contenders for the White House in 2012, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney came out ahead when voters were asked who they would support. Twenty-two percent of the 531 Republicans and Republican-leaning Independents said they would vote for Romney, 18% supported former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and 17% backed former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee. The rest of the choices dropped into single digits.

The margin of sampling error for results for both the total sample and for registered voters is plus or minus 3 percentage points.

Maggie McNeil

Read more at MarketWatch

Mitt Romney’s Riddle: What to do with Iowa

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010


DES MOINES – To hear Mitt Romney tell it, his return to Iowa Monday shouldn’t be interpreted as a clue to his 2012 presidential intentions for the first-in-the-nation state.

“I’m selling books,” Romney said in an interview, pointing at his book tour traveling companion from Macmillan. “He takes me around to the spots we think we can sell some books.”

But the several hundred Iowans who came out to see the former Massachusetts governor give a midday speech at the public library here and the hundreds more who attended his evening address at Iowa State University in Ames didn’t just do so because they have an appetite for policy-heavy tomes about how America can avoid decline.

While Romney’s stated uncertainty about launching another presidential bid might easily be dismissed as an obligatory equivocation, his unwillingness to commit to mounting a full-fledged Iowa campaign is grounded in experience.

The last campaign didn’t end well here for Romney. After spending considerable time and money in the state, he left Iowa limping in 2008, having lost by 9 percent to the underfunded Mike Huckabee. The defeat dealt a blow to his campaign that he never fully recovered from and left some of his most ardent supporters embittered that their investment had been for naught.

That loss now looms as a backdrop for Romney’s decision-making process heading into the next presidential race as he and his aides grapple with a handful of questions, the answers to which could go a long way to determining the contours of the GOP primary.

Chief among them: Given what happened to Romney here last time — and John McCain’s ability to win the GOP nomination after finishing fourth in the caucuses — can the early frontrunner run a slimmed-down Iowa campaign that lowers expectations without at the same time alienating local activists and opinion-makers?

The balancing act could prove difficult to pull off.

“It’s hard for him to be half-pregnant here,” said Ed Failor, Jr., an anti-tax leader in the state and longtime GOP strategist.

But if he goes that route, Romney may have some political cover.

In an interview, former Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad, who is now running to reclaim his old job and enjoys a wide lead in early polling against incumbent Democratic Gov. Chet Culver, suggested that Romney wouldn’t be punished were he to not go all-in here again.

“I think he should play in Iowa, but he maybe overplayed in the last go-round,” said Branstad, who will play an influential role in the 2012 presidential caucus should he win in November.

He added: “I don’t think you want to run against Iowa, [but] I’m not saying you’ve got to make Iowa the be all to end all.”

State House Minority Leader Kraig Paulsen, in a separate interview, said, “It has been proven you don’t have to win the caucuses to win the nomination, but I do think you have got to play and be credible.”

Read Complete Article at POLITICO

Huckabee endorses Mike Cox for Michigan governor

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

‘R’ recently sent us a message via Facebook suggesting this article be added to the Solid Principles Blog.

He added:  ”Mike Cox is the only candidate out of the top three running for governor here in Michigan not to endorse Gov. Romney in 2008.  I guess the enemy of my enemy is my friend?”

Livonia — Republican gubernatorial candidate Mike Cox has picked up an endorsement from Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor who ran for president in 2008.

In a statement released Wednesday by Cox’s campaign, Huckabee describes the Michigan attorney general as a “pro-life, pro-gun candidate.”
Huckabee says Cox is an innovative, strong leader who opposes “runaway tax and spend policies.”

Huckabee was Arkansas governor from 1996-2007 and unsuccessfully sought the GOP presidential nomination two years ago.
Cox is running to succeed Democratic Gov. Jennifer Granholm, who cannot seek re-election because of term limits.

Read Complete Article at The Detroit News

Conservatives wrap up meeting, eye midterm elections

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

Washington (CNN) – Conservatives wrapped up a three-day meeting in the nation’s capital on Saturday and headed back home looking ahead to midterm elections they hope will be a springboard to take back the White House in 2012.

More than 10,000 people attended the American Conservative Union’s Conservative Political Action Conference, an annual gathering that featured speeches from conservative leaders, potential presidential candidates and training sessions for grassroots activists who serve as the foundation of the Republican political base.

The unifying themes over the three-day conference were fiscal discipline, less taxes, limited government, and the speakers sought to play up voter frustrations, while predicting a comeback for the GOP in November, a little more than a year after suffering political losses.

For the handful of presidential hopefuls, the conference was an early audition and an opportunity to test political and policy themes. U.S. Rep. Mike Pence of Indiana made no apologies for trying to stop President Obama’s agenda in Congress, telling attendees Friday that he proudly wears the “Party of No” label that Democrats have tried to pin on Republicans.

“Some folks like to call us the ‘Party of No,’” Pence said during his speech Friday. “Well, I say ‘No’ is way underrated here in Washington, D.C. Sometimes ‘No’ is just what this town needs to hear.”

While he was well received, Pence placed fifth in the CPAC presidential straw poll that was won by Texas Rep. Ron Paul, a stalwart foe of government spending.

Paul, who developed a national following in the 2008 presidential campaign, ended former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney’s three-year winning streak for the poll. Romney placed second, while former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin had a disappointing third place finish, followed by Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty and Pence.

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, South Dakota Sen. John Thune and Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour rounded out the results.

Read More at CNN

GOP presidential potential Rick Santorum heads to Iowa

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

The last politician to go directly from losing a statewide election to winning the White House was Richard Nixon. After failing to win the 1962 California governor’s race, he suggested he was bowing out of politics, telling reporters “You won’t have Nixon to kick around any more.” Not, as it turned out, until 1968, when Nixon became the nation’s 37th president.

Apparently Rick Santorum, a former Pennsylvania senator, is hoping for an encore. A conservative Republican who lost his Senate seat in 2006, Santorum will be making his second trip to Iowa next month to headline the Iowa Christian Alliance 2010 Spring Kick-Off. The event is taking place in suburban Des Moines. Iowa is where the 2012 presidential race will kick off with local caucuses. President Obama’s unexpectedly big win in the state in 2008 positioned him to win his party’s nomination and, ultimately, the White House.

Here’s a look at the dance cards of some other Republicans who might be thinking of trying to move him out. As we noted last week in the On Politics blog, Sarah Palin will speak this week in Little Rock, home turf of another potential candidate, former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee. Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney will speak Thursday to this year’s Conservative Political Action Conference, a gathering of activists here in D.C. Last month, former House speaker Newt Gingrich was up in New Hampshire, which every four years holds the nation’s first presidential primary.

Update, 3:52 p.m. ET: We just got details on Huckabee’s upcoming travel plans. “I’ll be in MS and SC this week; NE and IA next week; over the next month will be in Texas, FL, and other places for candidates and party events,” the governor said in an e-mail relayed by his consultant, Kirsten Fedewa.

And we haven’t even gotten past this year’s midterm election.

A Question for solidprinciples.com

Sunday, February 7th, 2010

GREG ASKS: When likely will the 2012 gop candidates start announcing 2012 runs, like between fall thanksgiving 2010 and new years?

There are no real ‘hard and fast’ rules when announcing a Presidential Campaign.   According to Wikipedia, the 2008 Presidential Election saw Democrats Mike Gravel announced on April 17, 2006, followed by Tom Vilsack on November 30, 2006, Dennis Kucinich  December 12, 2006, John Edwards December 28, 2006, Joe Biden January 7, 2007, Chris Dodd January 11, 2007,  Hillary Clinton January 20, 2007, Bill Richardson January 21, 2007 and Barrack Obama February 10, 2007.   Beating the pack was Evan Bayh who announced in the aftermath of Kerry’s defeat in the 2004 election.

On the Republican side: Sam Brownback January 20, 2007,  Duncan Hunter January 23, 2007, Mike Huckabee January 28 2007, Rudy Giuliani February 5, 2007, John McCain February 28, 2007, Ron Paul March 12, 2007, Tommy Thompson April 1, 2007, Tom Tancredo April 2, 2007, Jim Gilmore April 26, 2007, Fred Thompson September 5, 2007, Alan Keyes September 14, 2007 and Mitt Romney February 7, 2008.

Going by this data (one has to consider this election involved a retiring President), the opposition party tend to announce after the Mid-Terms up to February the following year.  The incumbent party candidates usually announced the following year.  Another factor to consider is that the Democrats gained both houses during the 2006 Midterms.   This had a tendency to push forward Presidential announcements to take full advantage of the Mid-Terms victory momentum.  Meaning, Republican Presidential candidates speculation could be touted closer to the 2010 Mid-Terms.

Craig Edwards

O’Connor: Is Obama a half-term president or a political genius?

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

colleen oconner-gift-400x3842I try to avoid huge, time-consuming posts, but this article by Colleen O’Connor is so good, I couldn’t resist the temptation to use the bulk of her wonderfully written article.

She expresses, in her unique way, what many of us have been thinking these last 11 months……that Obama looked like he was on his way to being a one-term President after his first 6 months in office, but more recently, with his plummeting poll numbers and his insistence on betting the farm on his wrong-headed health care bill, that he is in danger of becoming a half-term President.

Only time will tell, but if the Senate stops his health care bill and refuses to allow an “emergency” session of Congress that would keep that body in session during what would be their traditional Christmas break, then it looks very, very likely that not only is the bill dead, but the Obama Presidency, for all intents and purposes, is dead as well.

~~John Cronin~~

http://www.sdnn.com/sandiego/2009-12-14/politics-city-county-government/politics-opinion/oconnor-is-obama-a-half-term-president-or-a-political-genius

By: Colleen O’Connor, SDNN

I may lose my day job.

I may be audited by the IRS.

I may even be in grave danger of ridicule.

But fearless, I proceed.

Mr. President, “You better watch out.”

Santa Claus isn’t coming to town. The Grinch, Scrooge, and numerous bill collectors are already here-knocking on doors — looking for you, and the Democrats.

You need help. Better advice. And a new direction.

So, in my own “audacity of hope,” I am giving you a Christmas present. It is a big box, with several items inside. The first item, is a dose of bare-knuckle truth.

A dose of bare-knuckle truth

You are in danger of becoming a “half-term President.”

The Republicans, with a clear message of “No”, are gaining ground.

Sarah Palin is within one point of your approval rating; Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney are within spitting distance of your job, and the GOP is leading in the Congressional generic ballot box question.

Let me put this in sports terms. Specifically, boxing. Several rounds into your presidency, your legs are starting to wobble.

You prefer fancy footwork, dancing around the ring, and playing to a crowd that enjoys spectacles. That worked well during the campaign, but gets you nowhere while governing.

Even when you are on the ropes (as you are now), you seem incapable of landing a punch, much less scoring a knockout.

You avoid confrontation because that locks you in the clinches, and your opponent’s rabbit punches bottle up your carefully-crafted showmanship.

Stop dancing around the ring

When the Soviet Union was disintegrating, a reporter asked President Gorbachev (who, like you, was more popular outside his country than in) the following question: “Mr. President, is it fair to say you are moving to the right?”

Gorbachev responded: “Actually, I’m going around in circles.”

So, too, are you, Mr. President.

You continue with your Chicago-style razzle dazzle, globetrotting and speechifying, while the country is engulfed in joblessness, foreclosures, escalating wars, and an economy that makes us poorer and more frightened by the day.

Bowing to the Emperor of Japan, the Princes of Saudi Arabia, and trying to charm the heads of Europe isn’t selling anymore.

Stay home

The U.S. is adrift, in the midst of a transformational period — one that pits the new “globalism” against a new “nationalism.”

While this may constitute a less violent civil war, it is still fracturing the country.

Your attempts to pivot the country’s attention away from the near intractable core causes of economic dislocation, is unworthy of any American President.

Using a scatter gun approach may be a clever strategy to keep criticism from gaining a footing. However, it mostly just confuses and alarms people.

The equally disingenuous attempt to shame those who dissent from this whirling dervish approach, by labeling them as selfish perpetrators of racism, diminishes us all.

Turning Americans against Americans, by using age, class, religion, education, and geography as wedges is crass politics — even if, by design, only your surrogates practice it.

Stick to your promises.

Promising one thing and delivering another is not just deceitful, it is corrosive to the body politic.

So, inside your gift box, I have included a pen and some paper to”make a list and check it twice.”

Making a list and checking it twice

Write down every campaign promise you made and check it twice.

Be honest.

– Winding down or ending wars? No.
– Ending lobbyists’ influence in politics? No.
– Providing money to Wall Street to save Main Street? No.
– Guaranteeing transparency? No.
– Bringing America together? No.
– Halting foreclosures? No.
– Providing widespread mortgage relief? No.
– Reigning in Wall Street? No.

Sad, isn’t it?

Next inside the gift box: A magnifying glass to focus better on your own Administration’s job performance.

Find out who’s naughty or nice

Skip trying to silence Fox News, Glen Beck, Sarah Palin, or anyone on the left, or right, or middle who disagrees with you. As of now, most of America does!

According to the latest Rasmussen poll, 65 percent of the American people believe the country is on the “wrong track.” And according to the latest polls, you have recorded an all-time low job approval ratings in each of the following:

Quinnipiac — 46 percent
Marist — 46 percent
CNN/Opinion Research — 48 percent
Ipsos/McClatchy — 49 percent
CBS News/New York Times — 50 percent

Trying to spin a political reality at odds with the country’s economic one is a losing proposition.

You may have told “60 Minutes” Sunday night that you, “did not run for office to be helping out a bunch of fat-cat bankers on Wall Street,” but the reality is otherwise.

“What’s really frustrating me right now is that you’ve got these same banks who benefited from taxpayer assistance, who are fighting tooth-and-nail with their lobbyists …up on Capitol Hill, fighting against financial regulatory control,” you said.

But saying it does not make it so! Clever to blame Congress and the lobbyists. The Democrats control Congress. You cut deals with the lobbyists.

Read an alternative explanation by Matt Taibbi, in the latest issue of Rolling Stone magazine.

Your guys are the bankers’ guys.

Or as Glen Greenwald writes, about your Nobel Peace Prize speech, “Like all good politicians, Obama is adept at paying homage to multiple, inconsistent views at once, enabling everyone to hear whatever they want in what he says while blissfully ignoring the rest.”

Want real change?

Say what you think. Do what you say. Forget the verbal parsing.

Fire those that gave away taxpayers’ money to the big banks — without mandating quid pro quo home loan modifications and an end to foreclosures; namely, Larry Summers and Tim Geithner.

Even the Harvard faculty voted “no confidence” in Summers when he was the university’s president. Geithner’s penchant for giving money to Wall Street when he was at the New York Fed is legendary.

They both should go. Let them, “spend more time with their families” or take positions at the bonus haven of Goldman Sachs. The American taxpayer can no longer afford their services.

Promote those still trying to salvage a middle class in America — namely, economic advisor Paul Volcker, TARP Congressional Oversight Chair Elizabeth Warren, and FDIC’s Chair Sheila Bair.

Add a sheriff to your Cabinet. President Johnson wished Kennedy had at least one local cop among all those theorists.

Harvard does not have a monopoly on intelligence. Bring in some outside help. Hire someone with “street smarts.”

You need more integrity and grit in the White House; not more “breezy arrogance,” or clever double speak.

Get rid of your non-stop public relations team still shilling “talking points” to the press, and a “new narrative” to the American people.

David Axelrod may want to “tell a story,” but most Americans want more substance and less picture book.

The photos ops are too obvious. As are the now tortured “firsts;” first dinner date, first dog, first day at Camp David, first six months, first 100 days, first Cabinet retreats, first West Point cadets for your war speech, first Christmas with Oprah, etc.

Same with the silly quips, “Grab a mop.” “Pick up a mop.” “Clean up the mess.”

Frankly, the Republicans are mopping the floor with you. (Just as the Democrats did with Bush and his once “brilliant,” now devastatingly ridiculous, “Mission Accomplished” stunt.)

The press is not your friend. Even if you did give GE (parent of NBC, MSNBC) government help, and lots of reporters jobs, and way more taxpayer money than conscionable their parent company’s subsidiaries. For which, of course, they gave you wonderful coverage.

When the people and polls turn against you, the press follows.

You are now in danger of becoming the political balloon boy — losing altitude and leaking valuable air-in dramatic fashion.

Colleen M. O’Connor is a former college history professor, the director of the “Faces of San Diego 2000″ family photographic history project and co-editor of Eleanor Roosevelt: An American Journey. She is an SDNN political columnist and can be reached at CoConnor15x(a)Yahoo.com

Read more: http://www.sdnn.com/sandiego/2009-12-14/politics-city-county-government/politics-opinion/oconnor-is-obama-a-half-term-president-or-a-political-genius#ixzz0Zlg8VQfe

New Perspectives on Mike (Huckabee)

Friday, December 4th, 2009

Hopefully the growing scandal that has been generated by former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee’s commutation of a vicious criminal’s 108 year sentence will send a huge wake-up call to his supporters.

I don’t mean to show any disrespect to anyone who has been a Huckabee fan up to this point, but his judgement as been seriously questioned by millions of voters around the country and rightly so.

One of the reasons we support politicians is because we trust their judgement. And we have seen very starkly over the course of the last few days that the lack of judgement can have lethal consequences.

Huckabee has been quoted as saying that if he was handed Maurice Clemmon’s file today, he would have made a much different decision than the one he made back in 2000. Ummm….I believe that comes under the 20/20 hindsight category.

What we value in leaders is their 20/20 foresight.

Let’s all learn a very difficult lesson in vetting our candidates. Their track records are very important. When they have a track record of growing government, raising taxes, pushing tax payer funded scholarships for the children of illegal aliens and commuting the sentences of still dangerous criminals, we must not ignore their past actions, no matter how good they are at schmoozing and playing the bass guitar.

~~John Cronin~~

Will the clemency scandal prompt a deeper examination of Mike Huckabee?

By David J. Sanders

A lot of Republicans were surprised last weekend to discover that Maurice Clemmons, the thug who killed four Washington state police officers, had been granted clemency from a long Arkansas prison sentence by leading GOP presidential prospect (and former Arkansas governor) Mike Huckabee.

As has been widely reported, Huckabee commuted Maurice Clemmons’s prison sentence in 2000, ten years after he was given a 108-year term for robbery and other crimes. He also was charged with possessing a handgun on school property.

The case was quickly dubbed “Huckabee’s Willie Horton,” after the murderer whose pardon by Michael Dukakis may have cost the former Massachusetts governor the presidency in 1988. Huckabee released a prepared statement via his website Sunday night, spreading blame for Maurice Clemmons by claiming that the criminal-justice systems in Washington and Arkansas had both failed. Two days later, he tried to limit the damage saying that he “accepted full responsibility” for the clemency, but adding that “if the same file were presented to me today, I would have likely made the same decision.”

The response from Huckabee’s political allies in Arkansas has been mixed.

Jason Tolbert, a budding Republican blogger and ardent Huckabee supporter, resigned his volunteer position as Arkansas coordinator for Huckabee’s political-action committee, Huck PAC, on Tuesday. “As most could imagine, the recent news of the last two days along with the response did play a role in this decision but was not the sole factor,” Tolbert said in a statement on his blog, The Tolbert Report.

State Sen. Gilbert Baker campaigned for Huckabee during the 2008 presidential campaign. Now the GOP frontrunner in the race for Blanche Lincoln’s U.S. Senate seat, Baker told the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette on Wednesday that he is still a “strong” Huckabee supporter and would be inclined to support Huckabee should he run for president in 2012.

Arkansas Republican-party officials would not comment on how the week’s news might impact Huckabee’s future, but one Arkansas GOP political operative who has supported Huckabee in the past said Thursday that “anyone with half a brain knows what this means for Huckabee’s political career — his goose is either cooked or packed in dry ice.”

The ramifications of Huckabee’s clemency policy on his presidential prospects may go well beyond Clemmons and the four police officers he is alleged to have killed in a coffee shop near Tacoma. During his more than ten years as governor, Huckabee issued clemencies to 1,033 convicted criminals, more than double the 507 clemencies issued in 17 years by his three predecessors (including Bill Clinton’s two stints).

Clemmons’s case wasn’t the first time Huckabee encountered trouble after extending compassion to criminals who, once freed from prison, returned to their old ways. Eugene Fields, a four-time driving-while-intoxicated offender, had his six-year sentence commuted by Huckabee not long after Fields’s wife made large donations to the Republican party of Arkansas. Fields later was arrested twice more for DWI. (I wrote a comprehensive piece about Fields for NRO two years ago.)

And then there was convicted rapist Wayne Dumond, who, less than a year after being let out of prison on parole, raped and killed a Missouri woman. Huckabee’s involvement in that case became a flashpoint during the 2008 presidential campaign.

But the real threat to Huckabee’s future career will come if the clemency controversy prompts a serious reexamination of the gubernatorial record of this Southern Baptist minister–turned-politician. Republicans eager to retake the White House in 2012 may choose to bypass him, based on a record of governance that at times mirrors the carelessness displayed in his mishandled clemencies. Prompted by the Washington tragedy, some of those who thought they knew the Other Man from Hope may be asking: Who is Mike Huckabee?

Huckabee has parlayed his social agenda (opposition to abortion, gay marriage, and gun control) and his language of faith and morality into a package with great appeal to elements of the religious Right. Indeed, Huckabee won the presidential straw poll at last September’s Values Voters Summit in Washington. His record as governor, however, was hardly conservative by conventional measurements: Arkansas state spending during Huckabee’s tenure soared by more than $5 billion, and taxes rose by about a half-billion dollars.

Arkansas Republicans expected Huckabee to roll back Clinton-era spending programs. Instead, he embraced Hillary Clinton’s children’s agenda — winning legislative approval for ARKids First, which extended free health care to children of the working poor and well into the middle class. Huckabee even went one better: He fought for a measure that would have granted Arkansas university scholarships to children of illegal aliens. He also won plaudits from teachers’ unions for his consistent opposition to school choice and voucher programs.

When he wrote a largely ignored book about his presidential campaign, he saved his harshest rhetoric for conservatives who dared to question his tax-and-spend record as governor. Huckabee said the “real threat” to the GOP is what he labeled “faux cons” — “libertarians masked as conservatives.” And who did he say represents the “faux cons”? The Club for Growth, which he calls the “Club for Greed,” and the Wall Street Journal editorial page.

Yet his frequent and questionable grants of clemency may be what finally trips him up. Prisoners seeking clemency during Huckabee’s tenure learned the importance of highlighting religious conversions as the centerpiece of their appeals. In seeking clemency, Clemmons wrote to Huckabee: “I have never done anything good for God, but I’ve prayed for him to grant me in his compassion the grace to make a start. Now, I’m humbly appealing to you for a brand-new start.”

The famously forgiving Huckabee may soon be looking for his own brand-new start.

David J. Sanders is a columnist with Stephens Media in Little Rock, Ark.

Read More at NRO

HuckPac: Apologists R Us

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

While Huckabee has fallen on the political hand grenade over Maurice Clemmons, his supporters over at HuckPac are still standing behind their man.

Novak, Alexander
12/01/2009 05:31 PM
Dear Governor,
Great job getting out in front of this and explaining what a ‘commutation’ and ‘pardon’ are. We still support you as we also pray for the 4 police officers and their families.

Paulo
12/01/2009 04:39 PM

Thank you Governor Huckabee for your candor and sincerity! You are not to blame nor are responsible for this weekend’s tragedy.

JULIEE 4 HUCKABEE, CA
12/01/2009 04:07 PM

Dear Governor Huckabee,
I appreciate you taking “full responsibility” for your actions. However, that is where your responsibility ends! You are not in the least bit responsible for the future choices Mr. Clemmons made during his life.

Lori Jungling
12/01/2009 02:48 PM

Thank you Governor. You are and always have been head and shoulders above other politicians and this proves it. You have nothing to gain by saying you take full responsibility except that you are doing the right thing. Other politicians take action in response to what is in it for them. Thank you for owning up to it. My prayers for the victims’ families and prayers for Gov. Huckabee that he may be strengthened in this dark hour.
Also, thank you for setting the record straight. It is bad enough that the liberal media is running with this but the fact that conservatives are using it to push their own agenda and candidates is sickening and embarrassing. Four lives have been lost, please think of that first.

SSC – Hardcore Texan
12/01/2009 11:07 AM

I sent an email to O’Reilly thanking him for allowing Mike to explain his role in the commutation of the criminal. It was a beneficial interview. I hope the media and pundits (left and right) will obtain ALL the facts and be fair to Mike in their coverage of this terrible tragedy. I pray his future political career will not be damaged.

Read more at HuckPac

Craig Edwards

Conservatives Hit Huckabee for ‘Cop Killer’ Clemency

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009


Conservative Media, Strategists Say Shooting Could End Populist GOPer’s Presidential Hopes

By: David Weigel

It was damage control worthy of a presidential campaign. On Sunday morning, former Gov. Mike Huckabee (R-Ark.) told the audience of “Fox News Sunday” that he was “nowhere near ready” for a 2012 presidential run. Hours later, the Seattle Times reported that Maurice Clemmons, a suspect in the killing of four police officers in Washington state, had been granted clemency by then-Gov. Huckabee back in 2000. Shortly before midnight, Huckabee released a statement on the killings through his political PAC. On Monday morning, he took to Fox News Radio for yet another take on the killings in Washington.

Huckabee’s multiple answers and explanations for his clemency decision have not quelled a riot of anger against him rising up from blogs, talk radio, and some Republican strategists who’ve worked against him in the past. For 24 hours, conservatives debated Huckabee’s role in the Washington tragedy. Opponents of the governor-turned-TV-host piled on, offering it up as proof that he could never lead the party. Even some former campaign aides suggested that the Clemmons clemency, in the context of many similar decisions Huckabee made during his 12-year stint in the governor’s office, had seriously damaged his hope of grabbing the Republican presidential nomination.

“Huckabee was—and likely remains—a true believer in the concept of restorative justice,” wrote Joe Carter, a veteran of Huckabee’s 2008 campaign who is now web editor of the conservative magazine First Things. “Ironically, what makes Huckabee such an appealing Presidential candidate—his empathy for all people and genuine belief in the individual—is also the trait that will prevent him from ever reaching the White House.”

Talk radio hosts set the tone for Monday. On the first hour of his show, Rush Limbaugh referred to Clemmons as “Huckabee’s Willie Horton,” comparing him to the criminal furloughed by then-Gov. Mike Dukakis (D-Mass.), whose subsequent crimes became a drag on the Democrat’s presidential campaign. “This guy who killed four cops is on the streets,” said Limbaugh, “because nine years ago—it bugs me because people—politicians and intellectuals—can’t withstand protest and stick to principles, and let a guy like this out.”

Those arguments were replicated on conservative news sites, Twitter feeds, and on Huckabee’s own Facebook page. National Review, the conservative biweekly that endorsed Mitt Romney over Huckabee and the rest of the Republican field in 2008, put the clemency story on its front page all day, informing readers that the former governor had enabled a “Suspected Cop Killer.”

WorldNetDaily, the widely read conservative site whose columnist Janet Porter was an influential early supporter of Huckabee, devoted its front page to an exhaustive story about Huckabee’s clemency. The American Spectator published multiple stories about Huckabee, including an irate attack from Quin Hillyer charging that “no amount of stagecraft featuring backlit crosses and folksy aphorisms should hide Huckabee’s culpability for such horrendous judgment.”

Huckabee’s Facebook thread on the story often got just as ugly. “As one who works in Law Enforcement, it gets old seeing criminal after criminal being released,” said one supporter. “Mike, I am deeply disappointed that you had anything to do with this sociopath being loose,” said another. Huckabee’s Wikipedia biography page was temporarily vandalized by a critic who screamed that Huckabee will “FOREVER BE KNOWN AS THE IDIOT WHO RELEASED THE COP KILLER MAURICE CLEMMONS.”

RedState.com, the influential conservative group blog, was dotted with diaries and posts attacking Huckabee. “How many Willie Hortons can one man have?” RedState’s Erick Erickson asked TWI.

Read more at washingtonindependent.com

The most important number in politics today

Friday, November 6th, 2009

Very interesting article by the WaPo’s Chris Cillizza. According to the Gallup poll numbers he references, the only two electable potential candidates in the Republican Party at the moment are Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney.

I was familiar with Newt Gingrich’s big negatives, which is one of the reasons I can’t get excited about him as a possible Presidential candidate in 2012, but I have to admit I was stunned by Palin’s numbers. 31-62!?

Maybe that is why Sarah Palin is attempting to hit the rubber chicken circuit and become an “ink-stained wretch.” With those sky high negatives she is well advised to pursue membership in the pundit class rather than the the political class, because it would take a series of miracles of Biblical proportions to reverse those numbers.

~~John Cronin~~

washingtonpost By: Chris Cillizza

50, that’s the percentage of adults who believe former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) is qualified to be president as opposed to 36 percent who believe he is not in a new national poll from Gallup.

Huckabee’s numbers on the “qualified” question were matched only by fellow former Gov. Mitt Romney (Mass.) with 49 percent qualified/39 percent not qualified rating. Other potential 2012 candidates like former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (44/46) and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (31/62) fared worse on the question.

On several other numbers in the Gallup data, Huckabee also shows surprising strength. Roughly seven in ten Republicans say they would seriously consider supporting the former Arkansas governor if he ran for president (the highest of any potential candidate) while 40 percent of adults and independents said the same (tied with Romney for the highest in each group).

What these numbers seem to point to is that there is a significant disconnect between how Huckabee is perceived within the Beltway and how he is regarded outside of it.

Most professional political strategists believe that Huckabee’s rise in 2008 was based entirely on the fact that the other major candidates ignored him. When attention focused on him in Iowa he pulled the memorable act of calling a press conference to preview a negative ad only to decide that he wouldn’t run it but would show it to the gathered reporters anyway. (We still can’t believe that happened.)

Moments like that coupled with Huckabee’s inability to build on his Iowa victory or grow his base of support beyond social conservatives has led most of the Republican chattering class to write him off despite polling that shows him solidly in the first-tier of candidates along with Romney and Palin.

But, it’s clear that Huckabee’s 2008 race had a far different impact on the average American. Huckabee’s run for president seems not only have left most Americans with a generally positive feeling about the former governor but also changed the perception of him from something of an entertaining oddity into someone who could be president one day.

It’s a similar phenomenon to what former Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.) experience between 2004 when he was the fresh-faced upstart to 2008 when he was taken far more seriously by voters and the political press.

While Huckabee clearly enjoys the good will of the American public at the moment, there still seems to be little political infrastructure in place to transform that likability into votes.

Unlike people like Romney and Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, Huckabee has no real political team to advise him on how to turn his native appeal into something more than that.

And, he appears to have no interest in building that sort of team.

While a candidate who listens solely to his or her advisers is a recipe for disaster, a candidate trying to win the highest office in the land who serves as his own political strategist isn’t much better.

Read More at Washington Post

Is Huckabee a ‘Conflicted Man’ for the GOP

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

On October 18th 2009, Rasmussen reported that in the race for GOP candidate for 2012, former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee lead the poll 29% ahead of former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney who ranked 24%. It also showed Huckeabee moving ahead of Romney, who was viewed as the GOP favorite since the defeat of Sen. John McCain in the 2008 President Election.

After bowing out of the 2008 Republican Primaries, Huckabee then moved onto Fox News appearing as a regular contributor and host of his own vehicle ‘Huckabee’. While building his profile on the premier conservative cable news channel, Huckabee also placed himself into a difficult future situation. The current climate of Fox News has been that of enemy of the state, according to the Obama Administration. While this skirmish is certain to evaporate by 2012, the aftermath could see heightened scrutiny placed on the network over it’s content or perceived agenda.

If Huckabee does take a stab at the White House in 2012, his association with Fox News will shadow his credibility. Any campaign coverage on Fox News for Huckabee will be viewed by Fox News / Huckabee critics as a “Conflict of Interest”. Yet, Huckabee is faced with a chicken or the egg like paradox. He needs Fox News to maintain his profile and without this exposure, his PAC looks shaky as a viable campaign fund raiser. Mitt Romney’s PAC ‘Free & Strong America’, has shown itself to be a magnet for extracting the GOP donation dollars. When the PAC semiannual reports were released, it revealed Huck PAC earned $304,673 as of June 30, meanwhile Romney’s PAC ‘powerhouse’ carried a lion-share of $2,641,466 as of September 30.

Leading early in the polls can also be a death knell, cast your mind back to March of 2007 when Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani was leading the GOP preferred candidate race with 34%. One year later, he was demolished in the Primaries by McCain, Huckabee, Romney and was even eating Ron Paul’s dust. However, the final thorn in the side for Huckabee remains his association with Fox News. If Huckabee were to resign from Fox News (perhaps at the end of this year), it would buy him enough time to bury the conflict of interest stigma. The longer he stays on Fox, the longer these allegation will fester. A recent overlooked ‘gaffe’ saw the ‘Host Huckabee’ & ‘PAC Huckabee’ appear as one and the same. If Huckabee does run in 2012, incidents like this will become ‘the perfect fodder’ for attack ads.

While Barrack Obama had the luxury of MSNBC/CNN cheering him on in 2008, the left prefers to overlook any allegations the press carried any conflict of interest in their coverage of Candidate Obama. We understand Huckabee needs to make a buck and no one can fault him for that. However, the left are kings of the double standards, and will crucify Huckabee if Fox News so much as speaks Candidate Huckabee’s name in 2012. It will all be forgotten if Huck throws in the towel and does a few rounds of the rubber chicken circuit until 2012.

Craig Edwards
Solid Principle Co-Founder

Is Huckabee About To Sink To The Bottom?

Thursday, October 8th, 2009

After the victory of Barack Obama, the GOP field opened up with Pawlenty, Jindal, Sanford, Romney, Huckabee and Palin all started to be tauted. Along the way, some casualties emerged like Sanford with his Argentinian mistress and Jindal with his cringe like Obama ‘rebuttal speech’.

However, 2012 is still a long way off and no one can be completely immune from gaffe or scandal.  Ever since Mike Huckabee landed a job at FOX News, I have always thought his inclusion would place Fox in a difficult position in 2012. When, or if Mike decides to run for office in 2012, how could he make an exit and not leave Fox News open to conflict of interest allegations for any coverage of Candidate Huckabee? In the meantime, the merging of ‘Host Huckabee’ & ‘PAC Huckabee’ may be his undoing.

Recently, Huckabee urged viewers of his Saturday show to go to balancecutsave.com and to sign a petition, that in turn redirected them to his own HuckPAC. That in turn asked them to sign a petition and also asks for donations. This action has now placed Fox News & Huckabee into the ire of FEC and FCC violations.

A recent meeting involving senior White House staffer David Axelrod & Fox News president Roger Ailes is also worth noting at this stage. If push came to shove, Huck could easily be placed into the category of a fall guy to starve off White House going after Fox News.

Huck is also flying close to the sun over his association with U.S Senate hopeful Paul Caprio, during a recent fundraiser.   Add these all together and Huckabee is heading into dangerous territory, the question is, will he survive this time or will be join Sanford on the GOP junk heap of 2012?

Additional reading: ktracy.com – Huckabee Named in Chicago Fundraising Lawsuit

Craig Edwards
Solid Principles Co-Founder

Mike Huckabee Wins Values Voter Summit Straw Poll

Saturday, September 19th, 2009

In what is known as a “beauty contest,” Mike Huckabee has won the Family Research Council’s “Values Voters Summit” poll. The vote can also be called a “straw poll” in that it has no binding effect, but is a preference poll that measures a candidate’s appeal to a very narrowly defined segment of the electorate.

Mike Huckabee continues his strong appeal to that portion of the voting public that places “family values” first in order of importance when it comes to issues that they fell very passionate about.

Having recognized that Gov. Huckabee is strong in the “Evangelical” wing of the Republican Party, I still have reservations about his ability to break out of that mold and broaden his appeal to the rest of the various interest groups that collectively form a voting bloc big enough to sweep Democrats out of office in 2010 in sufficient numbers to slow down the headlong plunge we have taken into a government controlled economy.

We saw what happens to a party in 2008 when it nominates a candidate who fails to excite the party’s “base” and is so unfocused and undefined in his message, that he manages to turn off moderate Democrats and the Independents as well. What happens? Defeat.

Obama happens, cap and trade bills happen, massive borrowing and spending happens, Van Jones happens……..and, thankfully, Town Hall push back happens.

We all have our favorite candidate and it is not my purpose here to beat the drums for a particular nominee, but rather to suggest that the best interests of the conservative movement lie in promoting a candidate whose message appeals to as wide a swath of the country as is consistent with remaining faithful to a core set of principles.

Remember the dictum in politics that if you craft your message too narrowly and win 100% of a group in the electorate that comprises 25% of likely voters, you lose the election 75%-25%!

~~John Cronin~~

Washington, D.C. - Mike Huckabee has convincingly won Family Research Council’s second-ever Values Voter Summit Straw Poll. Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty, Sarah Palin, and Mike Pence finished roughly tied for second place.

Only registered participants of the Summit who were present at the event were allowed to vote.

Family Research Council President Tony Perkins released the following statement in reaction to the second ever Values Voter Summit Straw Poll:

“We were surprised that the event’s turnout was more than double our expectations, clearly showing intensity among social conservatives. This was the first time potential conservative candidates could present their vision for change. We have over 1,800 registrants and over 175,000 unique online viewers.”

The following are the straw poll results:

Candidate Name Total Votes Percentage

1. Mike Huckabee 170 28.48%
2. Mitt Romney 74 12.40%
3. Tim Pawlenty 73 12.23%
4. Sarah Palin 72 12.06%
5. Mike Pence 71 11.89%
6. Newt Gingrich 40 6.70%
7. Bobby Jindal 28 4.69%
8. Rick Santorum 15 2.51%
9. Ron Paul 13 2.18%
10. Undecided 31 5.19%
11. Other 10 1.68%

* The full results can be accessed at www.frcaction.org

Members of FRC Action are only allowed to vote once. For more information on The Values Voter Summit, log onto www.valuesvotersummit.org