Posts Tagged ‘Health Care Bill’

Obamacare: The President’s Wooden-Headed Interpretation of Our Constitution

Friday, July 23rd, 2010

By: Ken Blackwell and Ken Klukowski

In chapter 4 of our book, The Blueprint: Obama’s Plan to Subvert the Constitution and Build an Imperial Presidency, we make the point that Team Obama would try to pull a fast one when it comes to Obamacare’s individual mandate that everyone reading this blog post needs to buy health insurance, or be subject to a penalty payable to your good friends at the IRS.

We first made this argument in a column we coauthored with Senator Orrin Hatch in the Wall Street Journal back in January. Now this issue has suddenly exploded back into the news.

For months, Team Obama has been saying that the individual mandate is authorized by Congress’ power to regulate interstate commerce found in the Commerce Clause. We explain in the book why that argument is a loser in court, and that the White House would have to pull a bait-and-switch and suddenly argue that the mandate is a tax (violating Obama’s promise not to raise taxes on anyone making less than $250K per year).

Looks like we were right. In their first filing against the multi-state lawsuit challenging Obamacare, Team Obama is now arguing that the individual mandate is… a tax.

If you read chapter 4 of our book, though, after we explain how the mandate is not authorized by the Commerce Clause, we then go on to explain how it is also unconstitutional if it’s a tax.

Evidently worried about this, Team Obama then goes on to argue that if the court doesn’t buy the tax argument either (because the argument is bogus, perhaps?), then it’s still justified under the General Welfare Clause.

Anticipating that, our next section in chapter 4 explains why the mandate is also not authorized by the General Welfare Clause.

We close that section by noting that one thing you’re taught in law school is that the General Welfare Clause doesn’t authorize the federal government to do anything. It is a limitation on federal power, not a source of additional power.

When you cite the General Welfare Clause, you’re grasping at straws. That’s exactly what Team Obama is doing. Their legal argument is desperate, because the Obamacare mandate is unconstitutional.

With Elena Kagan’s confirmation vote for the Supreme Court right around the corner, this issue could not be more timely. We need federal courts that will uphold the Constitution’s limits on federal power. They can start by striking down Obamacare.

http://biggovernment.com/kenandken/2010/07/19/obamacare-the-presidents-wooden-headed-interpretation-of-our-constitution/

White House in P.R. ‘panic’ over spill

Tuesday, May 4th, 2010

This Politico article says the Gulf oil spill is threatening Obama’s “reputation for competence.” The writer and I must be living on different planets.

Let’s keep in mind a partial list of Obama’s accomplishments.  The Health Care bill.  The Copenhagen climate summit.  The 2016 Olympics.  The Economic Stimulus.  10% unemployment.  Cash for Clunkers.  The auto industry bailouts.  Cash for caulkers.  Taxpayer funded abortion.  The Christmas Day bomber.  Janet Napolitano.  The attempted trial of terrorists in New York.  The attempted closure of Gitmo.  The attempted signing of FOCA (Freedom of Choice Act).  Need I go on?

This man’s election was a potential disaster for the country and the sooner the electorate ushers him and his enablers out of office, the better.

~~John Cronin~~

By GLENN THRUSH & MIKE ALLEN

The ferocious oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico is threatening President Barack Obama’s reputation for competence, just as surely as it endangers the Gulf ecosystem.

So White House aides are escalating their efforts to reassure Congress and the public in the face of a slow-motion catastrophe, even though it’s not clear they can bring it under control anytime soon.

“There is no good answer to this,” one senior administration official said. “There is no readily apparent solution besides one that could take three months. … If it doesn’t show the impotence of the government, it shows the limits of the government.”

Hope and change was Obama’s headline message in 2008, but those atop his campaign have always said that it was Obama’s cool competence — exemplified by his level-headed handling of the financial meltdown during the campaign’s waning days — that sealed the deal with independents and skeptical Democrats. The promise of rational, responsive and efficient government is Obama’s brand, his justification for bigger and bolder federal interventions and, ultimately, his rationale for a second term.

So there was a “little bit of panic,” according to one administration official, when White House aides sensed the oil spill narrative getting away from them last week. The White House was particularly alarmed by the rash of stories comparing the Obama administration’s initial response with President George W. Bush’s sluggish response in the wake of Hurricane Katrina in 2005.

Read more at Politico

Bart Stupak, Winner of The Neville Chamberlain of the Pro Life Movement Award Announces He’s Not Running for Re-election

Friday, April 9th, 2010

POLITICO Breaking News:

Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), who had a central role in the health reform fight as the lead of anti-abortion Democrats, plans to announce Friday that he will not run for reelection, a Democratic official said. Without Stupak on the ballot, the seat becomes an immediate pickup opportunity for Republicans.

For more information…http://www.politico.com

[Editor's note: Kudos to all the grassroots activists whose principled outrage at Stupak's sell-out of the Pro Life movement caused this Obamacare enabler to throw in the towel less than three weeks after his infamous cave in on the so-called Health Care "reform" bill reconciliation vote.

One less schmuck to toss out this November.]

~~John Cronin~~

 

Political Cartoons

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

ObamaCare Throws Pre-existing Condition Children Under the Bus

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

THE LIE

THE FACTS


WASHINGTON — Hours after President Barack Obama signed historic health care legislation, a potential problem emerged. Administration officials are now scrambling to fix a gap in highly touted benefits for children.
Obama made better coverage for children a centerpiece of his health care remake, but it turns out the letter of the law provided a less-than-complete guarantee that kids with health problems would not be shut out of coverage.

Under the new law, insurance companies still would be able to refuse new coverage to children because of a pre-existing medical problem, said Karen Lightfoot, spokeswoman for the House Energy and Commerce Committee, one of the main congressional panels that wrote the bill Obama signed into law Tuesday.

However, if a child is accepted for coverage, or is already covered, the insurer cannot exclude payment for treating a particular illness, as sometimes happens now. For example, if a child has asthma, the insurance company cannot write a policy that excludes that condition from coverage. The new safeguard will be in place later this year.

Full protection for children would not come until 2014, said Kate Cyrul, a spokeswoman for the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, another panel that authored the legislation. That’s the same year when insurance companies could no longer deny coverage to any person on account of health problems.

Read Complete Article at AP

Phone Calls Continue to Batter Congress

Friday, March 19th, 2010

Members continued to be inundated with phone calls from constituents and interest groups Friday thanks to an impending vote on health care reform this weekend.

Calls to the House numbered close to 100,000 an hour, creating a bottleneck in a phone system only meant to handle 50,000 calls an hour. The chamber has been similarly overloaded for four consecutive days, beginning on Tuesday when radio host Rush Limbaugh told viewers to call the Capitol switchboard phone number.

Jeff Ventura, spokesman for Chief Administrative Officer Dan Beard, said the problem was essentially unsolvable. The issue lies with the capacity of the cables buried underneath the Capitol complex — and even if those could be dug up and replaced, Members simply don’t have enough staff to answer so many calls, he said.

“Our capacity rate is about 50,000 calls an hour, and once we hit the 40,000 mark, we start to get these signals,” he said. “We’re beyond that. There’s no other way to say it other than the system is at capacity.”

Officials expect calls to taper off after the House’s scheduled Sunday vote on the health care reform package. But Ventura emphasized that the system for staffers’ BlackBerrys and smartphones was running smoothly.

“It’s not like Congress has come to a communication standstill,” he said.

This isn’t the first time Congress has been overcome with phone calls and e-mails in the runup to an important vote. Interest in the 2008 stimulus bill crashed House.gov and some Member Web sites, and in November, the Senate’s voice mail system was overloaded before the chamber’s cloture vote on health care reform legislation.

“It’s hard to predict the interest in this kind of legislation,” Ventura said. “I mean it’s historic. Here you have piece of legislation that is so defining, it’s just causing massive interest.”

Read more at Roll Call

Political Cartoons: Michael Ramirez

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

Obama Softly Threatens Dennis Kucinich

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010


President Obama just finished enthralling a crowd in Ohio in one of the last acts (one hopes) of his push to pass health-care reform. Rolling up his shirtsleeves, Obama began his speech with a little public arm-twisting, calling out a few of the local notables assembled; and way up at the top of his list was Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D), in whose district Obama was speaking.

Dennis Kucinich: The Wonder Years

Just in case it wasn’t clear why the congressman, who has criticized Obama from the left on issues such as Afghanistan, got such special mention, it was obvious seconds after Obama mentioned Kucinich’s name. Someone in the crowd screamed, “Vote yes!” The president responded with just a hint of guile, “Did you hear that, Dennis?” Kucinich, of course, is among the liberal House Democrats who might Ralph Nader-esquely vote against health-care reform because it’s not lefty enough for them.

“A couple other members of Congress are here,” Obama continued, making even plainer that Kucinich was being singled out. As the White House is privately putting the hard press on House members to vote for health reform, all of that attention from the president must be flattering – and one of the softest threats you’ll hear about in politics.

Read More at washingtonpost.com

Breaking Up Is Hard to Do

Saturday, March 13th, 2010


The press finally falls out of love with Obama.

By Howard Fineman | NEWSWEEK

Robert Gibbs, the White House Press Secretary, was 50 minutes late for his briefing, apparently a record for tardiness, but few reporters in the White House Press Room bothered to feign outrage; they didn’t seem all that eager to ask him questions anyway. When his boss flew to Missouri to give another of his “high octane” (The New York Times), “impassioned” (The Washington Post) health-care speeches, no cable channel covered the event. If you are president, the only thing worse than criticism is not being covered. And the truth is, we in the press are bored with Barack.

The “mainstream media” are losing patience with, and even interest in, their erstwhile hero. President Barack Obama never had a chance with the Ailes-Murdoch crowd, of course, and it didn’t take the president long to offend the fierce left wing of the blogosphere. But now, finally, the MSM, which views itself as ideologically neutral, has found ideologically neutral reasons to lose patience with him: that he may be ineffectual; that he doesn’t know how to play the game; that he can’t get anything done. Exhibit A: the health-care bill. The Times’s Frank Rich, the astute dean of the commentariat, wrote recently that Obama has failed to “communicate a compelling narrative” in office and, as a result, “could be toast if he doesn’t make good on a year’s worth of false starts.”

And yet this collective falling out of love is great news for Obama. Calling it quits with the MSM is just what he needs. A breakup might even save his presidency.

[Editor's Note:  This is what I meant by the major "Spin Cycle."  Obama's problems go way, way beyond the press' allegedly falling out of love with him.  It's not that the press no longer has warm and fuzzy feelings toward him, it's that the public feels like a jilted lover and is looking for a new knight in shining armor.  If he jams the health care bill through, the MSM's love affair will be instantly rekindled.  "Historic acheivement" and all that.]

U.S. Senator Scott Brown Delivers Weekly Republican Address

Saturday, March 13th, 2010

Scott Brown has delivered the Weekly Republican Address and he takes the opportunity to warn America once again of the disastrous Health Care Bill that the Dems appear willing to end their careers with. I supported Scott and made phone calls into Massachusetts for this very reason. Scott said he would vote to stop this toxic bill and he continues his fight against it.

I am asking our readers to help Scott by going over to dickmorris.com for the list of swing lawmakers that he has listed there and to call their offices all through this coming week, right up to the start of voting. My understanding is that Pelosi has scheduled the vote for the 18th. I know that information changes at warp speed these days, but that is the latest date that I am aware of.

Let’s take the fight to these people and let them know they will face the electoral wrath of the voters this November if they continue to defy us.

Thanks in advance.

~~John Cronin~~

Politico Breaking News: Health Care Vote Next Week

Friday, March 12th, 2010

Breaking News:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told her members Friday to brace themselves for a climatic health care vote as early as next week, warning them to clear their schedules for next weekend and promising to stay in session until the landmark vote, people present at the meeting told POLITICO. President Barack Obama has postponed an overseas trip until March 21, and Pelosi said, “I am delighted the president will be here for the passage of the bill. It will be historic.”

For more updates visit politico.com

Health Care Hell

Friday, March 12th, 2010

I’m pretty sure someone in Dante’s Inferno is condemned to spend eternity listening to C-SPAN panels on community rating.

By:  Jonah Goldberg

The time for talk is over.

So proclaimed the most talkative president in modern memory. I can’t remember when Barack Obama said that. Maybe it was during the first “final showdown” on health care. Or maybe it was the third. The fifth? It’s so hard to tell when pretty much every week since the dawn of the Mesozoic Era, either Obama or Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reid has proclaimed that it is now Go Time for health-care reform.

So you’ll forgive me if I’m somewhat skeptical about the possibility that the health-care reform debate is about to come to an end.

The president recently said, “Everything there is to say about health care has been said, and just about everybody has said it.”

But wait. If everything, pro and con, has been said about a subject by everybody, that means someone isn’t telling the truth, right? I mean, if you’ve said X and not-X, that means you’ve probably said something that isn’t true.

That, at least, is the impression I got this week listening to Obama make his closing arguments for health care at rallies in Pennsylvania and Missouri. It’s telling that the president — long in favor of a single-payer system — is selling his health-care plan on the grounds that it will increase “choice” and “competition,” reduce “government control,” and “give you, the American people, more control over your own health insurance.”

You know your sales pitch for a government takeover of health care hasn’t worked when you have to crib rhetoric from free-market Republicans. And that’s after you’ve already tried to pin your plan’s unpopularity on the ignorance of the American people.


Obama’s talking points track reality about as well as the screenplay for
Avatar. Indeed, the same week he was hawking competition, choice, and less government, Obama backed a new Health Insurance Rate Authority that would do even more to cement big health-insurance companies into their new role as government-run utilities.

This latest gambit is of a piece with the White House’s demonization of the health-insurance industry. I have no love for that industry myself, but let’s get some perspective. As of August, the health-insurance industry ranked 86th in terms of profit margins — behind anemic industries such as book publishing (38th), specialty eateries (71st), and home-furnishing stores (84th), according to data compiled by Mark Perry of the American Enterprise Institute.

Insurance companies account for less than 5 percent of American health-care spending — less than hospitals (31 percent), doctors (21 percent), and medicine (10 percent). But because health-insurance companies are unpopular, Democrats are beating up on them, even though if Democrats are serious about containing costs, the cuts will have to come from those other slices of the pie.

Read more at NRO

Obama delivers health care pitch in St. Charles, St. Louis

Thursday, March 11th, 2010


By:  Jake Wagman, Blythe Bernhard, Mark Schlinkmann

President Barack Obama brought his health care road show to the St. Louis area Wednesday, announcing a crackdown on waste and fraud in hopes of persuading a gridlocked Congress to pass sweeping health insurance reform.

After delivering a speech in St. Charles, Obama appeared at a downtown St. Louis fundraiser for U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo. Hundreds of protesters appeared in St. Charles and in downtown St. Louis, many to express opposition to the health care plan.

Obama’s speech in a stuffy gymnasium at St. Charles High School, his second health care address in three days, is part of a White House push to take the debate from the halls of Congress directly to voters, allowing the administration to frame the issue in its own terms.

Earlier in the week, Obama used the prospect of rising insurance premiums to make the case for health care reform. On Wednesday, in front of an invitation-only crowd in St. Charles, he offered a new angle, announcing additional oversight of federal programs.

Obama was joined on stage by McCaskill, a former state auditor whom the president praised as a person who “just pinches pennies.”

“Washington is a place where tax dollars are often treated like Monopoly money,” Obama said, “where waste — even billions of dollars in waste — is accepted as the price of doing business.”

Obama signed an executive memo Wednesday calling for greater use of “payment recapture audits,” which allows federal government departments to hire private auditors to find taxpayer funds paid in error or through fraud. The auditors can be paid based on the amount of improper payments they reclaim, providing incentive to root out waste.

The audits could be used to prevent overpayment in Medicare, Medicaid and, potentially, any new or expanded health care program.

The audit plan, which has bipartisan support, comes as Obama attempts to pick certain Republican ideas that could make his health care package more palatable across the aisle. Obama also expressed interest in a proposal from U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., to use undercover investigations to combat fraud.

The White House says expanded use of payment recapture audits could return $2 billion in taxpayer money over the next three years.

Hours before Obama’s speech, as many as 2,000 people gathered for a Republican rally at the St. Charles Convention Center.

“I have a question that I respectfully ask of my president,” Missouri Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder said. “What part of ‘no’ don’t you understand?”

Kinder and several GOP state legislators spoke in person at the event, while others delivered remarks from Washington via videoconferencing, displayed by a large TV screen. All were well-received by the enthusiastic crowd.

“This is so much more fun than watching C-SPAN, isn’t it?” remarked the announcer, local radio host Jamie Allman.

Among the long-distance speakers was the event’s organizer, U.S. Rep. Todd Akin of Town and Country, whose 2nd District includes St. Charles, and U.S. Rep. John Shimkus of Collinsville.

Akin called Obama’s bill “a threat from within and a danger from Washington, D.C.” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., also was taken to task by speakers.

“This is Pelosi versus the people, and we stand with the people,” Kinder said, adding that Democratic measures would turn the country “into something that is unrecognizable.”

“But we the people will have the final say,” he added.

Obama’s visit to St. Charles offered an opportunity to refocus attention on health care and attempt to blunt the opposition.

“The plan that I’ve put forward … incorporates the best ideas of Democrats and Republicans, even though the Republicans have a hard time acknowledging it,” he said, calling it a “common sense approach to protecting you from insurance company abuses and saving you money.”

He said the bill would force insurance companies to cover pre-existing conditions and ban insurers from dropping customers when they get sick. It would also offer a pool for individuals and small businesses that the president said would lead to lower premiums for many.

Obama — with sleeves rolled up and no jacket in the tightly packed gym — spoke with teachers and staff from the high school who were standing behind him. Most of his comments were met with applause from the invited audience of local officials and party activists.

Frank Scimo, 64, of Ballwin, said he helped organize a group of about 100 people outside the high school who came to support the president and health care reform.

“I believe the people should have health insurance,” he said. He pointed to his stepdaughter, who he said was denied insurance because of a pre-existing problem with her knees.

Amy Smoucha, an organizer with the nonprofit Jobs with Justice, said she left the speech feeling confident in the president and his plan. “I’m happy to see he is so sincere about fixing the health care system,” said Smoucha, 42.

Even those who don’t agree with Obama’s approach on health care came to catch a glimpse of the commander-in-chief.

“I am sincerely honored that the president of the United States has chosen to come to our county and my hometown,” said St. Charles County Executive Steve Ehlmann, a Republican. “I’m just not buying what he’s selling.”

Obama has asked Congress to deliver an “up or down” vote on health care by the end of next week. Each branch of Congress has approved its version of a health care reform bill, but, in order to take effect, lawmakers must agree to one identical bill.

If the administration musters the 216 House votes needed to pass Senate legislation, the next step would be the so-called reconciliation process, under which Congress hammers out a final version to submit to the Senate for an up-or-down vote requiring a simple majority.

Polls show split public opinion on the direction of health care. Outgoing U.S. Sen. Christopher “Kit” Bond, R-Mo., said the president’s speeches in St. Charles and elsewhere — he was in Philadelphia on Monday and will be in Ohio next week — are an attempt by Obama to use oratorical skills to sell a plan Americans don’t want.

“He is trying to cram it through. He has shown that he is not listening,” Bond, who is retiring when his term ends this year, said. “He thinks if he talks very slowly, we will understand.”

U.S. Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., who is running for Bond’s seat, proffered a more measured approach to health care, endorsing incremental steps — such as limiting lawsuits and allowing patients to shop across state lines for insurance.

“Go back to the things that everybody believes would change the system. Do a handful of those in the next couple of years. Then see what needs to be done,” Blunt said.

This week’s visit was Obama’s third trip to the St. Louis area since he took office last year.

At Wednesday’s speech at St. Charles High, Obama was joined by several local Democratic officials. One noticeable absence was Democratic Senate hopeful and Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan, who has attempted to distance herself from Obama. Carnahan, the state’s chief security regulator, was in Washington on Wednesday talking to lawmakers about financial reform.

A White House official said Wednesday that Carnahan’s visit to Washington was planned before the president’s trip here was scheduled, and that Carnahan has already asked to appear with the president at an event soon.

McCaskill, who flew to St. Louis with Obama on Air Force One, did not have to wait.

On Wednesday evening at the Renaissance Grand hotel downtown, Obama headlined a fundraiser for McCaskill, who is not up for re-election until 2012. Tickets ranged from $25 for standing room to $25,000 for dinner and a photo with the president.

Outside, several hundred protesters representing a wide spectrum of viewpoints stood on nearby street corners, chanting slogans and yelling at one another through bullhorns.

A large group of local Tea Party activists gathered on one corner, while a smaller group of Obama supporters set up shop on another corner. Across the street was a mixed bag of protesters and activists who seemed less vocal.

Rose Green, 70, had never seen a sitting president in person before watching Obama talk Wednesday downtown.

“A president, a black president. It’s history, and I’m a part of it,” Green said. “It was worth the wait.”

Related Reading at STLtoday

Stupid Comments with Pelosi #1

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

Watch on You Tube

Doctor’s White Coats as Props

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

Remember at last week’s Health Care Summit at the Blair House when Obama derided Eric Cantor’s use of the 2,400 page Medicus Maximus bill as a “prop“? Evidently Obama thought that was just too hokey.

Of course, his trotting out a bunch of Doctors in their white coats, which are never worn away from a medical care facility, is somehow supposed to convince the voters to OK the Federal takeover of 17% of the GDP!

How RIDICULOUS!

We have sunk to close to rock bottom when the POTUS resorts to amateurish hokum, to cartoon images, to try to sneak through a bill that would permanently fund the grizzly business of Planned Parenthood with tax payer money and end many of the freedoms that we have enjoyed in this country.

I wanted to post an image of the same type of Doctor’s white coats that Obama has been using in his Health Care infomercials in an attempt to demonstrate how silly the whole exercise as become.

Here’s hoping the pain and suffering of watching this God forsaken bill in it’s unending death throes will finally come to a merciful end within the next couple of weeks as a Congress wary of it’s re-election prospects finally kills the bill!

~~John Cronin~~


Death Rattle With Suits

Sunday, February 28th, 2010

When I first started thinking of what graphic I would use in this post from my Word files, it only took a couple of seconds to eliminate my “Night of the Living Dead” graphic from consideration and to reuse the “RIP gravestone” instead.

It is becoming clearer that the Left believes Obamacare is dead and that Congressional Dems have no choice but to try to ram it through under the budget reconciliation provision.

With the polls so heavily stacked against it, the Democratic Party appears to be willing to fall on their swords rather than to admit defeat on Obamacare.  So be it.

~~John Cronin~~

By:  James Campion

The forty-fourth president of the United States appears to be as possessed by a doomed agenda as the last one. Maybe at this point Barack Obama has no choice. It has now been over a year and there is still no National Health Care Reform Law, only a massively incoherent pile of legislation that only a minority of Americans want and less understand, a Democratic Party if not split, certainly splintered over, and a Republican opposition that despite hundreds of its amendments added to the thing, continue to rail against it for political leverage.

If the 2/25 Health Care Summit between lawmakers on both sides of the political aisle chaired by the chief executive displayed anything, it’s that whatever remains of the national health care debate is merely a death rattle, some distant bugle call over a bloody and silent battle field.

For the most part, the crazy talk was over. It was lawmakers doing what lawmakers do, muddy the facts and refute the rebukes. Over seven or so hours of speeches and debate, boring presentations of facts and figures, and the obligatory spate of pointless drivel, there remained the same conclusion as when it began; the current Senate version of Health Care Reform is vehemently opposed by every Republican, hardly endorsed by moderate Democrats, and barely a boon for Liberal ones.

What began in spirit as a negotiation continued in a series of disjointed debates. And as hard as the president pained to keep it civil and above-board, many on his side and the other reduced it to talking points and posturing. There was serious points made, but just as many derided. So, as my beloved maternal grandmother, Carmella Martignetti, the great political philosopher of the twentieth century once mused; “It is over, but it doesn’t know enough to lie down.”

For his part, the President revealed a side to him that I once believed, and to a lessoning extent still believe is his strongest asset, the ability to rise above the fray, beyond mere politics and generation, someone who is not tainted by Boomer angst and old-line rhetoric. It is a side that was rarely seen during his first tumultuous year, wherein this massive undertaking of national legislation which makes up roughly 17 percent of the federal budget was not enough to send him to the Hill but once. This legacy-making moment came and went, came again and then went again, with a steely resolve and almost robotic detachment.

Only one speech given at a special assembly of congress last year, arguably Obama’s only effective oratory to date, could begin to budge events, but even that was not enough. Bringing us to yesterday’s performance, which was even and presidential, a true display of leadership, and not in that phony, affected way you might have seen by pros like Reagan or Clinton, but more down and dirty with a bit more polish than the “everyman” version utilized by the last guy. An objective observer, if there is such an animal anymore, would have to admit to its courageous outreach and balanced effort to determine the agreements, differences and spaces between both when coming to difficult conclusions about a major overhaul in federal legislation.

But what was the point really?

Firstly, it is far too late. This should have been done, as clearly and concisely with a trust in the electorate to comprehend, from the very beginning, rather than the lofty presentations and bully-tactics that ushered it in and pushed it through. But most importantly, there is no time, never mind the four-to-six week psuedo-deadline given by the president at summit’s end, to cobble together four or five or ten disparate philosophies over spending, the extent of government involvement, regulatory ceilings and floors, and the stemming of insurance and dictatorial fraud both in the private and government levels.

The next and only step for this President and his Democratic majority is to turn to Reconciliation, an oft-used process of avoiding a filibuster threat with a mere majority of fifty-one votes over the required sixty that is always vilified by the opposition until it gains power. It is pure democratic politics, as the law allows. Democrats and Republicans alike have used it to great effect, most dramatically with the infamous Contract With America in the mid-nineties. There is nothing to deride beyond its premise, which is another debate entirely. And although ramming a bill through a Reconciliation vote is an easy target to bash as one-party tyranny, as both the president and vice president decried when used several times by the previously Republican-controlled congress, it is now the only way any Health Care Reform Bill will be turned into law.

Read More at Huffington Post

FLASHBACK: Democratic Party 2005

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Biden: “I pray God when the Democrats take back control we don’t make the kind of naked power grab you are doing.”
OBAMA & DEMS IN 2005: 51 VOTE ‘NUCLEAR OPTION’ IS ‘ARROGANT’ POWER GRAB AGAINST THE FOUNDER’S INTENT

Showdown at Blair House

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

Republicans should show the president where we should be going and what’s wrong with what the White House has proposed.

By:  Joseph Antos and Thomas P. Miller

Now that the White House has put a health-care plan on the table, Barack Obama says he wants the Republicans to do the same in Thursday’s meeting with congressional leaders. Instead, Republicans should show the president where we should be going and what’s wrong with what the White House has proposed.

It is disingenuous for Democrats to claim that they don’t know what’s in the Republican health-reform playbook. House Republicans filed more than 60 health-reform bills last year. Reps. Paul Ryan, Tom Price, and John Boehner filed comprehensive reform bills. A new list of proposals that Republicans support is published nearly every day. On health care, the president’s problem with Republicans is not that Republicans have failed to offer policies. His problem is that he doesn’t like Republicans’ policies.

The president’s proposal and the Democrats’ rhetoric are full of words like “choice” and “competition,” but they really mean command and control. Their approach creates overlapping layers of new laws and regulations intended to anticipate everything that could go wrong and prevent it. Every problem — the uninsured, rising insurance premiums, ineffective and expensive care — is supposedly addressed. Every solution further centralizes power and decision-making in Washington, and none of it comes cheap.

Worse yet, it won’t succeed. The problem for social planners is that Americans do not always embrace their leaders’ vision of social responsibility, particularly when that vision is at odds with their self-interest. Onerous provisions will be ignored, worked around, or even repealed if public opposition is strong enough.

What will work — in fact, what cannot be avoided — is a reform that levels with the American people about what is possible and what is necessary. The hard truth is that there is no magic bullet that will solve every problem once and for all. Health reform is a process, not a single act of Congress. To set that process into motion, we must first give individuals — not government — more control over health-care decisions.

We need better information about prices, insurance plans, and treatment alternatives. And we need to bear in mind that because health decisions are complicated, most people rely on expert agents — their family doctors, or their employers — to do much of the heavy lifting. These agents need better information and stronger incentives to provide options and advice that are truly in the best interest of the consumer.

Read more at NRO

Just Say No

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

As you know President Obama wants to have yet ANOTHER marathon talk-fest about his dead in the water health care “reform” bill.  He has invited the Pubbies to sit down and in a “systematic” way go over the various points of his Medicus Maximus bill to see if any “common ground” exists.  I sincerely hope Congressional Republicans are smart enough to see this for the setup that it is.  The only point of this dreary, tiresome exercise in futility is to paint the GOP as the “Party of No.”

When I was making calls for Scott Brown’s campaign, one dyed-in-the-wool Democrat said we were the “Party of No.”  I did not respond to his sarcasm but the thought did go through my head that being the ” party of no” was a very reasonable stance to take when considering the awful implications for society from this disastrous bill.

I urge the GOP to remain the “Party of No,” not for craven political reasons, but because it is good for the country.  There is a very strange political philosophy that has tried to ingrain itself in Washington since the 2008 elections.  It is almost self-destructuve in it’s attempt to remake the economy and society in a way that is anathema to a vast majority of Americans.  You know this, I know this and poll after poll reflect it.  And yet the lemmings of the Democrat Party have, until the Massachusetts Miracle was pulled off, continued to follow the lead of a rogue President who seems wedded to noxious bills that have been rejected by the voters, who have gone to great lengths to express their displeasure about the direction the country is headed in.

Hopefully the Republican leadership will reamin committed to their policy of united opposition to Obama’s attempt to wreck the Health Care industry and in the process, the economy.  I predict that grateful voters will reward the GOP with big gains in both Houses of Congress this November.

Sometimes just saying “No” is a good thing.

~~John Cronin~~

Hey, Washington, D.C.—-Can You Hear Us Now?

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

Note to rocket scientists in Washington, D.C. You have just been delivered a new set of instructions from the voters of Massachusetts and, by proxy, the rest of the country. We want you to recycle all the paper you wasted printing up your dopey Health Care bill, because we AIN’T gonna do that.

Scott Brown says we ain’t, 53% of the voters of MA. say we ain’t and a super majority of the rest of the voters across the country say we ain’t.

Two more thoughts. Don’t bother trying to crawfish out of your votes for this monstrous bill. We have been paying attention, we have taken note of your names and your party and we will remember in November. And finally, be advised that you have now been relegated to caretaker status. We will not accept ANY major pieces of legislation from you people. Since you have shown your true colors, since you have shown beyond a reasonable doubt that you can not be trusted with as much power as you were temporarily given, we have determined that your only real role at this point is to keep the country safe (got my fingers crossed on that one) and to provide other necessary government services, but beyond that, we want you to keep a low profile, serve out your terms and we will finish clean up operations in November of this year and in 2012.

~~John Cronin~~