<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Solid Principles &#187; Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/tag/congress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
			<item>
		<title>The 26 Senators Who Said &#8216;No&#8217; to Debt Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/the-26-senators-who-said-no-to-debt-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/the-26-senators-who-said-no-to-debt-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 19:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt Ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solid Principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget Deficits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Debt Ceiling Vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/?p=12223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most conservative Senate Republicans &#8212; along with a handful of liberal Democrats who think it went too far &#8212; voted against the debt bill. One senator who didn&#8217;t fit that category was moderate Democrat Ben Nelson, who also voted no, but he&#8217;s up for re-election in 2012. L to R: Chambliss, Ayotte, Coats , DeMint  Here&#8217;s the full [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1719" title="" src="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/GOP-no.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="265" /></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>The most conservative Senate Republicans &#8212; along with a handful of liberal Democrats who think it went too far &#8212; voted against the debt bill.</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">One senator who didn&#8217;t fit that category was moderate Democrat Ben Nelson, who also voted no, but he&#8217;s up for re-election in 2012.</span></p>
<div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter" style="text-align: left;">
<dl id="attachment_12235" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><img class="size-full wp-image-12235" title="" src="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/no-gop.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="131" /></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd"><em><span style="color: #ff0000;">L to R: Chambliss, Ayotte, Coats , DeMint </span></em></dd>
</dl>
</div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Here&#8217;s the full list of the 26 senators who voted against the bill:</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Kelly Ayotte (R-NH)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Saxby Chambliss (R-GA)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Dan Coats (R-IN)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Tom Coburn (R-OK)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Jim DeMint (R-SC)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Lindsey Graham (R-SC)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Chuck Grassley (R-IA)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Tom Harkin (D-IA)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Orrin Hatch (R-UT)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Dean Heller (R-NV)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Jim Inhofe (R-OK)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Ron Johnson (R-WI)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Mike Lee (R-UT)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Bob Menendez (D-NJ)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Jeff Merkley (D-OR)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Jerry Moran (R-KS)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Ben Nelson (D-NE)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Rand Paul (R-KY)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Marco Rubio (R-FL)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Bernie Sanders (I-VT)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Jeff Sessions (R-AL)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Richard Shelby (R-AL)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Pat Toomey (R-PA)</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> David Vitter (R-LA)</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #000080;">READ MORE AT </span></strong><a title="The 26 Senators Who Said ‘No’ to Debt Deal" href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0811/The_26_senators_who_said_no_to_debt_deal.html" target="_blank"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/politico.jpg" alt="" width="129" height="35" /></a></p>

<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><fb:like href="http%3A%2F%2Fwww.solidprinciples.com%2Fblog%2Fthe-26-senators-who-said-no-to-debt-deal%2F" layout="standard" show_faces="true" width="450" action="like" colorscheme="light"></fb:like></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/the-26-senators-who-said-no-to-debt-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McConnell Sends Another Invite For Conversation Obama Deemed Not Worth Having</title>
		<link>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/mcconnell-sends-another-invite-for-conversation-obama-deemed-not-worth-having/</link>
		<comments>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/mcconnell-sends-another-invite-for-conversation-obama-deemed-not-worth-having/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 17:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debt Ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deficit Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Presidential Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/?p=11346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In light of last Tuesday&#8217;s White House &#8216;Snub&#8217;, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has again sent another invite to President Barack Obama to meet on solving the debt ceiling debate. Read Full Story &#8216;McConnell rallies, invites Obama to Hill again&#8217; at Politico &#8211; Click Image to open link in a new window/tab Further Reading: Obama [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter">
<dl id="attachment_11347" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 437px;">
<p class="wp-caption-dt" style="text-align: center;"><a title="politico.com: McConnell rallies, invites Obama to Hill again (CLICK to open link in a new window/tab)" href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0711/McConnell_rallies_invites_Obama_to_Hill_again.html" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-11347 " src="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/mitchmcconnell.jpg" alt="" width="427" height="500" /></a></p>
<p class="wp-caption-dd"><strong><span style="color: #000080;">In light of last Tuesday&#8217;s White House &#8216;Snub&#8217;, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has again sent another invite to President Barack Obama to meet on solving the debt ceiling debate</span></strong>. <em><span style="color: #ff0000;">Read Full Story</span><span style="color: #ff0000;"> &#8216;McConnell rallies, invites Obama to Hill again&#8217; at Politico</span></em> &#8211; <strong><span style="color: #808080;">Click Image to open link in a new window/tab</span></strong></p>
</dl>
</div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><span style="color: #000080;">Further Reading: </span></em><strong><a title="Politico:  Obama debt ceiling taunts draw fire from Republicans (CLICK to open link in a new window/tab)" href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/58132.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;">Obama debt ceiling taunts draw fire from Republicans</span></a></strong> <span style="color: #000080;">- Politico.com</span></p>

<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><fb:like href="http%3A%2F%2Fwww.solidprinciples.com%2Fblog%2Fmcconnell-sends-another-invite-for-conversation-obama-deemed-not-worth-having%2F" layout="standard" show_faces="true" width="450" action="like" colorscheme="light"></fb:like></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/mcconnell-sends-another-invite-for-conversation-obama-deemed-not-worth-having/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>53% Favor Repeal of Health Care Law As Expectation of Repeal Hits New High</title>
		<link>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/53-favor-repeal-of-health-care-law-as-expectation-of-repeal-hits-new-high/</link>
		<comments>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/53-favor-repeal-of-health-care-law-as-expectation-of-repeal-hits-new-high/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 19:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmussen Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamcare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/?p=11338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A majority of American voters continue to favor repeal of the health care law passed by Congress last year and the number who expect repeal has reached a new high. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 53% of Likely Voters at least somewhat favor repeal of the health care law, while 39% [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5531" title="Health Care Protest" src="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/drudge-2.jpg" alt="" width="228" height="344" /></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">A majority of American voters continue to favor repeal of the health care law passed by Congress last year and the number who expect repeal has reached a new high.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 53% of Likely Voters at least somewhat favor repeal of the health care law, while 39% at least somewhat oppose it. This includes 40% who Strongly Favor repeal and 29% who are Strongly Opposed. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">Fifty-three percent (53%) also believe that it is at least somewhat likely the law will be repealed. That’s a seven point jump from a month ago and the highest expectation of repeal yet measured. As with all such jumps, it remains to be seen whether this is the start of a new trend or merely statistical noise. Only 30% consider repeal unlikely, while 17% are not sure.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">Still, the overwhelming sense about whether the law will be repealed is uncertainty. Only 17% say repeal is Very Likely and 6% believe it is Not At All Likely. That means three-out-of-four Americans (77%) are less certain of the outcome.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">The numbers concerning the health care law have changed little since it was passed last year. A majority of voters have favored repeal every week but one since it was passed and even in the one exception a plurality favored repeal. The number of voters supporting repeal has ranged from 47% to 63% in that time period.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">The dynamics have remained the same as well, with most Republicans and unaffiliated voters favoring repeal while most Democrats are opposed. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">Older voters are more supportive of repeal than younger voters. The number who Strongly Favor repeal has consistently been higher than the number of Strongly Oppose it. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Read More at </span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><a title="rasmussenreports.com: 53% Favor Repeal of Health Care Law As Expectation of Repeal Hits New High (Open link in a new window/tab)" href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/health_care_law" target="_blank"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8521" src="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/rasmussenLogoHome.gif" alt="" width="149" height="50" /></a></span></p>

<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><fb:like href="http%3A%2F%2Fwww.solidprinciples.com%2Fblog%2F53-favor-repeal-of-health-care-law-as-expectation-of-repeal-hits-new-high%2F" layout="standard" show_faces="true" width="450" action="like" colorscheme="light"></fb:like></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/53-favor-repeal-of-health-care-law-as-expectation-of-repeal-hits-new-high/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weiner Set to Call it Quits</title>
		<link>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/weiner-set-to-call-it-quits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/weiner-set-to-call-it-quits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solid Principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOXNEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep. Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weinergate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/?p=10724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; What a circus American politics has become. Barnum and Bailey can&#8217;t top what goes on under the Capitol rotunda on almost a daily basis. Another zany Liberal has shown that he has just as much integrity in dealing with women as he does with the poor, beleaguered taxpayer. Use them for what ever selfish [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong> </strong></span></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div id="attachment_10490" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 553px"><strong><img class="size-full wp-image-10490" src="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/weinergating-e1308261365107.jpg" alt="" width="543" height="335" /></strong><p class="wp-caption-text">Twitter Catches Another Politician Showing His True Colors (Pun Intended)</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong> </strong><span style="color: #000080;">What a circus American politics has become. Barnum and Bailey can&#8217;t top what goes on under the Capitol rotunda on almost a daily basis.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">Another zany Liberal has shown that he has just as much integrity in dealing with women as he does with the poor, beleaguered taxpayer. Use them for what ever selfish and corrupt end result you have in mind and then lecture them on what you believe THEIR character faults are.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">What a hypocrite! Weiner was arrogant and condescending in every interview I ever saw him doing and all the while this horn dog was out there marketing himself as being available for something other than representing the people of his district.<img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10457" src="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Anthony-Weiner-underpants-300x217.png" alt="" width="300" height="217" /></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">These folks have got some world class chutzpah when they go &#8220;tsk, tsk&#8221; if a Republican goes south but expect the country to be &#8220;understanding and forgiving&#8221; when one of their big spenders gets caught in his jockey shorts.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">Well, as I sometimes end my phone calls with Solid Principles Co-Founder, Craig Edwards, we&#8217;ll just have to wait and see what new outrage tomorrow will bring!</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>~~John Cronin~~</strong></span></p>

<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><fb:like href="http%3A%2F%2Fwww.solidprinciples.com%2Fblog%2Fweiner-set-to-call-it-quits%2F" layout="standard" show_faces="true" width="450" action="like" colorscheme="light"></fb:like></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/weiner-set-to-call-it-quits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is History on House Members’ Side in 2012?</title>
		<link>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/is-history-on-house-members%e2%80%99-side-in-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/is-history-on-house-members%e2%80%99-side-in-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Presidential Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Dornan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Gephardt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horace Greeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mo Udall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Crane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rothenbergpoliticalreport.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STUART ROTHENBERG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Jennings Bryan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/?p=10462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This story first appeared in RollCall.com, Roll Call on June 9, 2011. By STUART ROTHENBERG The last major party candidates nominated while they were in the House or just after they had left the House were William Jennings Bryan (D) in 1896, Garfield in 1880 and Horace Greeley (Whig) in 1872. As a general rule, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-4053" src="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/RecommendedRead.jpg" alt="" width="275" height="121" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><em><span style="color: #ff0000;">This story first appeared in RollCall.com, Roll Call on June 9, 2011.</span></em></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">By STUART ROTHENBERG<br />
</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">The last major party candidates nominated while they were in the House or just after they had left the House were William Jennings Bryan (D) in 1896, Garfield in 1880 and Horace Greeley (Whig) in 1872.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">As a general rule, few House Members run for president, and those who do usually fare poorly. (By comparison, Senators frequently run for president, with a record four of them seeking the Democratic nomination in 2008.)</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">During the past 50 years, only a few sitting House Members have been regarded as serious contenders for a presidential nod: Democratic Reps. Dick Gephardt (Mo.) in 1988 and 2004 and Mo Udall (Ariz.) in 1976 and Republican Rep. Jack Kemp in 1988. Illinois Rep. John Anderson ran a credible race for the GOP nomination in 1980 until dropping out to run for president as an Independent.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">Other House Members have sought a major party nomination, but they have usually been either long shots hoping lightning would strike, such as California Republican Rep. Duncan Hunter (2008) and Illinois Republican Rep. Phil Crane (1980), or ideologues with a vocal but very narrow following, such as Ohio Democratic Rep. Dennis Kucinich (2004 and 2008), California Republican Rep. Bob Dornan (1996) and Texas Republican Rep. Ron Paul (in 2008 and again in 2012).</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Read Entire Article at</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://rothenbergpoliticalreport.com/news/article/is-history-on-house-members-side-in-2012"><img class="size-full wp-image-10463 aligncenter" src="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/rothenberg.jpg" alt="" width="350" height="73" /></a></p>

<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><fb:like href="http%3A%2F%2Fwww.solidprinciples.com%2Fblog%2Fis-history-on-house-members%25e2%2580%2599-side-in-2012%2F" layout="standard" show_faces="true" width="450" action="like" colorscheme="light"></fb:like></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/is-history-on-house-members%e2%80%99-side-in-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

