Was this speech worth paying Palin $100,000 to give?
COMMENTS WELCOME
-
LINKS
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Crystalf on When You’re Holding a Hammer, Everything Looks Like a Nail
- David on USA Environmental groups Target Chilean Energy Development
- craig on Behind The ‘Attactivism’ Facebook Curtain
- Crystalf on Mitt Romney praises labor at New Hampshire town hall
- Crystalf on Is Huckabee Becoming The Anti-Romney Godfather?
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
Meta
Sarah did a very nice job on the speech. She touched on a lot of topics that conservatives want to hear. Perhaps she had a checklist like Obama. Not to say it was a speech like Obama but just that he hit on so many topics at the SOT that Palin’s speech seem to touch on just about every conservative concern. All in all it was excellent to this conservative’s ears.
That being said I would like to move from substance to style. Lets face it, Sarah is folksy and simplistic. Some people like that about her. It certainly makes her likable but it is kind of hard to imagine her tackling something complex. I think she lacks the sophistication. Some may say that is a good thing but in my view it seems a tad unpresidential. Her you betcha politics are a bit polarizing and if she were to run for office in 2012 it would be stark contrast to the other prominent prospective candidates who seem more trustworthy on complex issues. Sorry Sarah, just sayin’.