<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Solid Principles &#187; State of the Union</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/category/state-of-the-union/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
			<item>
		<title>Chief Justice Roberts: State of the Union a Pep Rally (Video)</title>
		<link>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/chief-justice-roberts-state-of-the-union-a-pep-rally-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/chief-justice-roberts-state-of-the-union-a-pep-rally-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Justice Roberts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/?p=5188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justice Roberts: State of the Union a &#8216;Political Pep Rally&#8217; Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts ruffled feathers Tuesday when he criticized Obama for scolding the Supreme Court during his State of the Union address in January. Speaking to law students at the University of Alabama, Roberts called the speech a &#8220;political pep rally&#8221;: Read More at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><object id='cspan-video-player' classid='clsid:d27cdb6eae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000' codebase='http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,0,0' align='middle' height='500' width='410'><param name='allowScriptAccess' value='true'/><param name='movie' value='http://www.c-spanvideo.org/videoLibrary/assets/swf/CSPANPlayer.swf?pid=292439-1&#038;start=2696&#038;end=2782'/><param name='quality' value='high'/><param name='bgcolor' value='#ffffff'/><param name='allowFullScreen' value='true'/><param name='flashvars' value='system=http://www.c-spanvideo.org/common/services/flashXml.php?programid=220760&#038;style=full&#038;start=2696&#038;end=2782'/><embed name='cspan-video-player' src='http://www.c-spanvideo.org/videoLibrary/assets/swf/CSPANPlayer.swf?pid=292439-1&#038;start=2696&#038;end=2782' base='http://www.c-spanvideo.org/videoLibrary/assets/swf/' allowScriptAccess='always' bgcolor='#ffffff' quality='high' allowFullScreen='true' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' pluginspage='http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer' flashvars='system=http://www.c-spanvideo.org/common/services/flashXml.php?programid=220760&#038;style=full&#038;start=2696&#038;end=2782' align='middle' height='500' width='410'></embed></object></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5191" src="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Justice-Roberts-State-of-the-Union-a-Political-Pep-Rally-300x187.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="187" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #000080;">Justice Roberts: State of the Union a &#8216;Political Pep Rally&#8217;</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000080;">Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts ruffled feathers Tuesday when he criticized Obama for scolding the Supreme Court during his State of the Union address in January. Speaking to law students at the University of Alabama, Roberts called the speech a &#8220;political pep rally&#8221;:</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5193" src="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/atwire.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="102" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #000080;">Read More at </span><a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/opinions/view/opinion/Justice-Roberts-State-of-the-Union-a-Political-Pep-Rally-2786/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>theatlanticwire.com</strong></span></a></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>

<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><fb:like href="http%3A%2F%2Fwww.solidprinciples.com%2Fblog%2Fchief-justice-roberts-state-of-the-union-a-pep-rally-video%2F" layout="standard" show_faces="true" width="450" action="like" colorscheme="light"></fb:like></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/chief-justice-roberts-state-of-the-union-a-pep-rally-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats: The Snow Ate My Jobs Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/democrats-the-snow-ate-my-jobs-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/democrats-the-snow-ate-my-jobs-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/?p=3884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate Democrats will miss their self-imposed deadline for bringing a jobs bill to the floor Monday, and they’re hoping that the weekend’s epic snowstorm will give them some cover. Senate votes scheduled for Monday evening have been pushed back to Tuesday on account of the storm, but it seems unlikely that Democrats would have been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3885" src="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/article-0-082CAB42000005DC-726_634x431-e1265685140893.jpg" alt="" width="472" height="238" /><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-156" src="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/NewPolitico_Logo.gif-300x80.gif" alt="" width="300" height="80" /></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">Senate Democrats will miss their self-imposed deadline for bringing a jobs bill to the floor Monday, and they’re hoping that the weekend’s epic snowstorm will give them some cover.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">Senate votes scheduled for Monday evening have been pushed back to Tuesday on account of the storm, but it seems unlikely that Democrats would have been ready to proceed Monday, anyway.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said last week that he believed “very emphatically” that the Senate would hold a vote on the first of a series of jobs bills Monday.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">But there was no agreement on a bill late Sunday afternoon, and aides to senators involved in the discussions cautioned against expecting much progress by Monday.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #000080;">Read more at </span></strong><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/32658.html " target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Politico</span></strong></a></p>

<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><fb:like href="http%3A%2F%2Fwww.solidprinciples.com%2Fblog%2Fdemocrats-the-snow-ate-my-jobs-bill%2F" layout="standard" show_faces="true" width="450" action="like" colorscheme="light"></fb:like></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/democrats-the-snow-ate-my-jobs-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Approval, drops</title>
		<link>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/obama-approval-drops/</link>
		<comments>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/obama-approval-drops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guess Who Isn't Going Well in the Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmussen Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Presidential Tracking Poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/?p=3773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much like the stock market, Obama&#8217;s approval numbers also dropped.  In the aftermath of the State of Union address President Obama&#8217;s approval jumped to -4, now five days later it drops back to &#8211; 15.  According to Rasmussen, 26% of the nation&#8217;s voters Strongly Approve while Forty-one percent (41%) Strongly Disapprove.  That brings Obama to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-260" src="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/Rasmussen-Reports.gif" alt="" width="249" height="83" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000080;">Much like the stock market, Obama&#8217;s approval numbers also dropped.  In the aftermath of the State of Union address President Obama&#8217;s <a href="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/?p=3639" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">approval jumped to -4</span></strong></a>, now five days later it drops back to &#8211; 15.  According to Rasmussen, 26% of the nation&#8217;s voters Strongly Approve while Forty-one percent (41%) Strongly Disapprove.  That brings Obama to the same levels pre-SOTU. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3774" src="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/obama_approval_index_february_6_2010.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="300" /><strong><span style="color: #000080;">Read More at</span></strong> <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>rasmussenreports.com</strong></span></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><span style="color: #000080;">Go to</span> </strong><strong><a href="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/?p=3822" target="_self"><span style="color: #ff0000;">February 7th, 2010 Polls Result</span><span style="color: #ff0000;">s</span></a></strong></span></p>

<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><fb:like href="http%3A%2F%2Fwww.solidprinciples.com%2Fblog%2Fobama-approval-drops%2F" layout="standard" show_faces="true" width="450" action="like" colorscheme="light"></fb:like></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/obama-approval-drops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SOTU: CONFUSION AND INDIGNATION</title>
		<link>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/sotu-confusion-and-indignation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/sotu-confusion-and-indignation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck DeVore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union Address]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/?p=3531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Assemblyman Chuck DeVore The President’s first State of the Union Address was an appropriate reflection of his first year in office: rhetorically ambitious, pragmatically muddled, ideologically dangerous, and surprisingly naïve for a product of the Chicago political machine. But as with F. Scott Fitzgerald’s Amory Blaine, for whom “It was always the becoming he dreamed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3532" src="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/flashreport.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="87" /><span style="color: #000080;">by Assemblyman Chuck DeVore</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">The President’s first State of the Union Address was an appropriate reflection of his first year in office: rhetorically ambitious, pragmatically muddled, ideologically dangerous, and surprisingly naïve for a product of the Chicago political machine. But as with F. Scott Fitzgerald’s Amory Blaine, for whom “It was always the becoming he dreamed of, never the being,” so too did Barack Obama focus more upon ascending to high office than on using it well. The President is now stuck upon his pinnacle. To borrow a metaphor from the Owens Valley where I spent my high school years, he’s a turtle on a post: you aren’t sure how he got there, and he’s not sure what he’ll do about it.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #000080;"><em>Assemblyman Chuck DeVore, is currently <a href="http://www.chuckdevore.com/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><span style="font-style: normal;">running for the United States Senate </span></strong></span></a>against Barbara Boxer</em></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">Read More at</span> <a href="http://www.flashreport.org/featured-columns-library0b.php?faID=2010012809134792" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Flash Report</strong></span></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1157" src="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/episode10.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="300" /></p>
<h3><span style="color: #000080;">Back on <a href="http://www.solidprinciples.com/index.php/podcast/episode_10/" target="_self"><span style="color: #ff0000;">Episode 10</span></a> of the Solid Principles Podcast, we conducted a detailed interview with Assemblyman <a href="http://www.chuckdevore.com/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;">Chuck DeVore</span></a>.  You can <a href="http://www.solidprinciples.com/podcast/episode_10.mp3" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;">download the podcast here</span></a> or<span style="color: #ff0000;"> </span><a href="http://www.solidprinciples.com/index.php/podcast/episode_10/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;">stream via our webpage</span></a><span style="color: #ff0000;"> </span>or download at <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=319760854" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;">iTunes</span></a>.</span></h3>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #000080;"><object id="audioplayer1" width="234" height="54" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://www.solidprinciples.com/player/audio-player/player.swf"><param name="movie" value="http://www.solidprinciples.com/player/audio-player/player.swf" /><param name="FlashVars" value="playerID=1&amp;bg=0xf8f8f8&amp;leftbg=0xeeeeee&amp;lefticon=0x666666&amp;rightbg=0xcccccc&amp;rightbghover=0x999999&amp;righticon=0x666666&amp;righticonhover=0xffffff&amp;text=0x666666&amp;slider=0x666666&amp;track=0xFFFFFF&amp;border=0x666666&amp;loader=0x9FFFB8&amp;soundFile=http://www.solidprinciples.com/podcast/episode_10-stream.mp3" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="menu" value="false" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /></object></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"> </span></p>

<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><fb:like href="http%3A%2F%2Fwww.solidprinciples.com%2Fblog%2Fsotu-confusion-and-indignation%2F" layout="standard" show_faces="true" width="450" action="like" colorscheme="light"></fb:like></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/sotu-confusion-and-indignation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.solidprinciples.com/podcast/episode_10.mp3" length="35137246" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.solidprinciples.com/podcast/episode_10-stream.mp3" length="13211107" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calvin Woodward of AP Debunks #SOTU</title>
		<link>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/calvin-woodward-of-ap-debunks-sotu/</link>
		<comments>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/calvin-woodward-of-ap-debunks-sotu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calvin Woodward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSPAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/?p=3528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Calvin Woodward the chief AP  debunker has gone over Obama&#8217;s claims during last night&#8217;s State of The Union address. By CALVIN WOODWARD WASHINGTON (AP) &#8211; President Barack Obama told Americans the bipartisan deficit commission he will appoint won&#8217;t just be &#8220;one of those Washington gimmicks.&#8221; Left unspoken in that assurance was the fact that the commission won&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/?p=1388" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Calvin Woodward</strong></span></a> <span style="color: #000080;">the chief AP  debunker has gone over Obama&#8217;s claims during last night&#8217;s State of The Union address.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-565" title="AP-Associated-Press" src="http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/AP-Associated-Press-300x74.gif" alt="" width="300" height="74" /></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">By CALVIN WOODWARD</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">WASHINGTON (AP) &#8211; President Barack Obama told Americans the bipartisan deficit commission he will appoint won&#8217;t just be &#8220;one of those Washington gimmicks.&#8221; Left unspoken in that assurance was the fact that the commission won&#8217;t have any teeth.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">Obama confronted some tough realities in his State of the Union speech Wednesday night, chief among them that Americans are continuing to lose their health insurance as Congress struggles to pass an overhaul.<br />
Yet some of his ideas for moving ahead skirted the complex political circumstances standing in his way.<br />
A look at some of Obama&#8217;s claims and how they compare with the facts:<br />
&#8212;<br />
<em> OBAMA: &#8220;Starting in 2011, we are prepared to freeze government spending for three years. Spending related to our national security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will not be affected. But all other discretionary government programs will. Like any cash-strapped family, we will work within a budget to invest in what we need and sacrifice what we don&#8217;t.&#8221;</em><br />
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> THE FACTS: The anticipated savings from this proposal would amount to less than 1 percent of the deficit &#8211; and that&#8217;s if the president can persuade Congress to go along.<br />
Obama is a convert to the cause of broad spending freezes. In the presidential campaign, he criticized Republican opponent John McCain for suggesting one. &#8220;The problem with a spending freeze is you&#8217;re using a hatchet where you need a scalpel,&#8221; he said a month before the election. Now, Obama wants domestic spending held steady in most areas where the government can control year-to-year costs. The proposal is similar to McCain&#8217;s.</span></strong><br />
&#8212;<br />
<em> OBAMA: &#8220;I&#8217;ve called for a bipartisan fiscal commission, modeled on a proposal by Republican Judd Gregg and Democrat Kent Conrad. This can&#8217;t be one of those Washington gimmicks that lets us pretend we solved a problem. The commission will have to provide a specific set of solutions by a certain deadline. Yesterday, the Senate blocked a bill that would have created this commission. So I will issue an executive order that will allow us to go forward, because I refuse to pass this problem on to another generation of Americans.&#8221;</em><br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong> THE FACTS: Any commission that Obama creates would be a weak substitute for what he really wanted &#8211; a commission created by Congress that could force lawmakers to consider unpopular remedies to reduce the debt, including curbing politically sensitive entitlements like Social Security and Medicare. That idea crashed in the Senate this week, defeated by equal numbers of Democrats and Republicans. Any commission set up by Obama alone would lack authority to force its recommendations before Congress, and would stand almost no chance of success.</strong></span><strong><br />
</strong> &#8212;<br />
<em> OBAMA: Discussing his health care initiative, he said, &#8220;Our approach would preserve the right of Americans who have insurance to keep their doctor and their plan.&#8221;</em><br />
T<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>HE FACTS: The Democratic legislation now hanging in limbo on Capitol Hill aims to keep people with employer-sponsored coverage &#8211; the majority of Americans under age 65 &#8211; in the plans they already have. But Obama can&#8217;t guarantee people won&#8217;t see higher rates or fewer benefits in their existing plans. Because of elements such as new taxes on insurance companies, insurers could change what they offer or how much it costs. Moreover, Democrats have proposed a series of changes to the Medicare program for people 65 and older that would certainly pinch benefits enjoyed by some seniors. The Congressional Budget Office has predicted cuts for those enrolled in private Medicare Advantage plans.</strong></span><br />
&#8212;<br />
<em> OBAMA: The president issued a populist broadside against lobbyists, saying they have &#8220;outsized influence&#8221; over the government. He said his administration has &#8220;excluded lobbyists from policymaking jobs.&#8221; He also said it&#8217;s time to &#8220;require lobbyists to disclose each contact they make on behalf of a client with my administration or Congress&#8221; and &#8220;to put strict limits on the contributions that lobbyists give to candidates for federal office.&#8221;</em><br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong> THE FACTS: Obama has limited the hiring of lobbyists for administration jobs, but the ban isn&#8217;t absolute; seven waivers from the ban have been granted to White House officials alone. Getting lobbyists to report every contact they make with the federal government would be difficult at best; Congress would have to change the law, and that&#8217;s unlikely to happen. And lobbyists already are subject to strict limits on political giving. Just like every other American, they&#8217;re limited to giving $2,400 per election to federal candidates, with an overall ceiling of $115,500 every two years.</strong></span><strong><br />
</strong> &#8212;<br />
<em> OBAMA: &#8220;Because of the steps we took, there are about 2 million Americans working right now who would otherwise be unemployed. &#8230; And we are on track to add another one and a half million jobs to this total by the end of the year.&#8221;</em><br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong> THE FACTS: The success of the Obama-pushed economic stimulus that Congress approved early last year has been an ongoing point of contention. In December, the administration reported that recipients of direct assistance from the government created or saved about 650,000 jobs. The number <span style="color: #ff0000;">was based on self-reporting by recipients and some of the calculations were shown to be in error.</span></strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><br />
</strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong> The Congressional Budget Office has been much more guarded than Obama in characterizing the success of the stimulus plan. In November, it reported that the stimulus increased the number of people employed by between 600,000 and 1.6 million &#8220;compared with what those values would have been otherwise.&#8221; It said the ranges &#8220;reflect the uncertainty of such estimates.&#8221; And it added, &#8220;It is impossible to determine how many of the reported jobs would have existed in the absence of the stimulus package.&#8221;</strong></span><strong><br />
</strong> &#8212;<br />
<em> OBAMA: He called for action by the White House and Congress &#8220;to do our work openly, and to give our people the government they deserve.&#8221;</em><br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong> THE FACTS: Obama skipped past a broken promise from his campaign &#8211; to have the negotiations for health care legislation broadcast on C-SPAN &#8220;so that people can see who is making arguments on behalf of their constituents, and who are making arguments on behalf of the drug companies or the insurance companies.&#8221; Instead, Democrats in the White House and Congress have conducted the usual private negotiations, making multibillion-dollar deals with hospitals, pharmaceutical companies and other stakeholders behind closed doors. Nor has Obama lived up consistently to his pledge to ensure that legislation is posted online for five days before it&#8217;s acted upon.</strong></span><strong><br />
</strong> &#8212;<br />
<em> OBAMA: &#8220;The United States and Russia are completing negotiations on the farthest-reaching arms control treaty in nearly two decades.&#8221;</em><br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong> THE FACTS: Despite insisting early last year that they would complete the negotiations in time to avoid expiration of the 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty in early December, the U.S. and Russia failed to do so. And while officials say they think a deal on a new treaty is within reach, there has been no breakthrough. A new round of talks is set to start Monday. One important sticking point: disagreement over including missile defense issues in a new accord. If completed, the new deal may arguably be the farthest-reaching arms control treaty since the original 1991 agreement. An interim deal reached in 2002 did not include its own rules on verifying nuclear reductions.</strong></span><strong><br />
</strong> &#8212;<br />
<em> OBAMA: Drawing on classified information, he claimed more success than his predecessor at killing terrorists: &#8220;And in the last year, hundreds of al-Qaida&#8217;s fighters and affiliates, including many senior leaders, have been captured or killed &#8211; far more than in 2008.&#8221;</em><br />
<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong> THE FACTS: It is an impossible claim to verify. Neither the Bush nor the Obama administration has published enemy body counts, particularly those targeted by armed drones in the Pakistan-Afghanistan border region. The pace of drone attacks has increased dramatically in the last 18 months, according to congressional officials briefed on the secret program.</strong></span><strong><br />
</strong> &#8212;<br />
Associated Press writers Jim Kuhnhenn, Jim Drinkard, Erica Werner, Robert Burns and Pamela Hess contributed to this report.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;">Read Article at <a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100128/D9DGKDT00.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>My Way</strong></span></a></span></p>

<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><fb:like href="http%3A%2F%2Fwww.solidprinciples.com%2Fblog%2Fcalvin-woodward-of-ap-debunks-sotu%2F" layout="standard" show_faces="true" width="450" action="like" colorscheme="light"></fb:like></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/calvin-woodward-of-ap-debunks-sotu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

