SOLID PRINCIPLES PODCAST: Episode 25

March 9th, 2010

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

podcast25.jpg

SOLID PRINCIPLES PODCAST: Episode 25

Mulvaney vs. The Blue Lap Dog: How did South Carolina’s ‘Blue Dog’ Democrat John Spratt, suddenly turn into Nancy Pelosi’s lap dog? Now this long term serving Congressman, faces the race of his life from the conservative Republican State Senator, Mick Mulvaney this November. As part of the 2010 Contenders Series, Solid Principles spoke to Mulvaney on his pursuit for representing the 5th Congressional District of South Carolina.

DOWNLOAD, add the RSS Feed or get it from iTunes / Stitcher

Ohio Governor: Kasich 49%, Strickland 38%

March 9th, 2010


Republican challenger John Kasich has extended his lead over incumbent Democrat Ted Strickland to 11 points in Ohio’s gubernatorial race.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of Ohio voters finds Kasich leading Strickland 49% to 38%. Six percent (6%) prefer another candidate, and seven percent (7%) are undecided.

Last month, Kasich held a six-point lead – 47% to 41% – over Strickland, mirroring the 47% to 40% lead he had in early January. These results also show little change from the first survey of the contest conducted in December.

Huckabee endorses Mike Cox for Michigan governor

March 9th, 2010

‘R’ recently sent us a message via Facebook suggesting this article be added to the Solid Principles Blog.

He added:  ”Mike Cox is the only candidate out of the top three running for governor here in Michigan not to endorse Gov. Romney in 2008.  I guess the enemy of my enemy is my friend?”

Livonia — Republican gubernatorial candidate Mike Cox has picked up an endorsement from Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor who ran for president in 2008.

In a statement released Wednesday by Cox’s campaign, Huckabee describes the Michigan attorney general as a “pro-life, pro-gun candidate.”
Huckabee says Cox is an innovative, strong leader who opposes “runaway tax and spend policies.”

Huckabee was Arkansas governor from 1996-2007 and unsuccessfully sought the GOP presidential nomination two years ago.
Cox is running to succeed Democratic Gov. Jennifer Granholm, who cannot seek re-election because of term limits.

Read Complete Article at The Detroit News

Politico Playback

March 9th, 2010

Very funny characterization of Nancy Pelosi’s Health Care Bill “shell game.”

~~John Cronin~~

The End of the Road for Barack Obama?

March 9th, 2010

The British newspaper The Telegraph opines today that Obama may be coming to the end of his road as POTUS.

More and more often words like “desperation,” “in-fighting,” “demoralized” and “fractious” are being used to describe an administration that once held out hope to it’s partisans that it would be able to deliver the long hoped for socialist paradise where life would be easy, our every whim would be government’s command and it could all be paid for by taxing “the rich” who would be thrilled to see their hard earned wealth confiscated. After all, it was such a noble cause, who wouldn’t want to contribute more and more so that the masses could do less and less.

But then reality hit this feckless administration between the eyes.  Isn’t it funny how 15,000,000 unemployed Americans, jaw-dropping deficits and the endlessly proferred middle finger salute from the White House to the voters can galvanize public opinion?

With his poll numbers headed south and most of his policies with lopsided, upside down approve/disapprove ratios as well, Obama has demonstrated that he has spent his own political capital almost as fast as he is burning through our money with his ineffective, redistributive policies.

On March 18, we are told that Obama wants to have his “up or down vote” on the shop worn Health Care bill that has been drug through both Houses of Congress for the last year.  Whichever way the vote goes, IMHO Obama is done.  If it passes, it will be the middle finger to the voters and they will return the sentiment in November.  If it fails, it’s ” The Emperor Has No Clothes” and Obama’s opponents in both parties will move in to wrest power from him.  Obama has painted himself into the proverbial corner and it doesn’t look like their is any way for him to get out.  That being said, I don’t for a moment think we can let our guard down until this administration is politely ushered from the Oval Office back to being private citizens.  What a welcome relief that will be!

~~John Cronin~~

A thrashing of the Democrats in the mid-terms would not necessarily be the beginning of the end for Mr Obama: Bill Clinton was re-elected two years after the Republicans swept the House and the Senate in November 1994. But Mr Clinton was an operator in a way Mr Obama patently is not. His lack of experience, his dependence on rhetoric rather than action, his disconnection from the lives of many millions of Americans all handicap him heavily. It is not about whose advice he is taking: it is about him grasping what is wrong with America, and finding the will to put it right. That wasted first year, however, is another boulder hanging from his neck: what is wrong needs time to put right. The country’s multi-trillion dollar debt is barely being addressed; and a country engaged in costly foreign wars has a President who seems obsessed with anything but foreign policy – as a disregarded Britain is beginning to realise.

There are lessons from the stumbling of Mr Obama for our own country as we approach a general election. Vacuous promises of change are hostages to fortune if they cannot be delivered upon to improve the living conditions of a people. The slickness of campaigning that comes from a combination of heavy funding and public relations expertise does not inevitably translate into an ability to govern. There is no point a nation’s having the audacity of hope unless it also has the sophistication and the will to turn it into action. As things stand, Barack Obama and America under his leadership do not.

Read Complete Article at telegraph.co.uk

Activists tell Obama to protect illegals

March 9th, 2010

Immigrant rights groups on Monday demanded that President Obama impose a full moratorium on deportations of illegal immigrants, arguing that his policies have been worse for their cause than those of his Republican predecessor.

Saying they’ve been “betrayed” by and lost patience with Mr. Obama, the advocates suggested that the president could regain their support by leading a fight on Capitol Hill for a bill to legalize illegal immigrants. Mr. Obama took the first step toward legalization during a meeting Monday at the White House with two lawmakers working on a bill.

But a bill could take months to pass. In the meantime, the immigrant rights groups say, Mr. Obama must end deportations altogether.

“We demand an immediate stop to all deportations, because each one of these deportations, each one of these numbers, equals a life destroyed and a family devastated,” Angelica Sala, executive director of the Coalition for Human Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, said at a news conference in Washington.

The government reported 387,790 deportations in fiscal 2009, which spanned the last few months of the George W. Bush administration and more than eight months of the Obama administration. That marked a small increase over fiscal 2008, when deportations totaled 369,221.

The Obama administration insists that its enforcement policies target unscrupulous employers and stop abusive practices that target illegal immigrants.

“This administration is focused on smart, effective immigration enforcement that focuses first on those dangerous criminal aliens who present the greatest risk to the security of our communities, not sweeps or raids to target undocumented immigrants indiscriminately,” said Homeland Security Department spokesman Matt Chandler.

Legalization versus enforcement has driven tense debate for years.

Read more at washingtontimes.com

Preview of Solid Principles Podcast 25

March 8th, 2010

Just had the pleasure of speaking to South Carolina State Senator Mick Mulvaney, running for Congress in the Fifth Congressional District against Rep. John Spratt.

Watch on You Tube

Political Cartoons: Michael Ramirez

March 8th, 2010

Romney in the Wilderness, Waiting

March 8th, 2010

By:  Robert Costa

New York — Mitt Romney, sitting ramrod straight, is gazing up at the gleaming glass boxes on Park Avenue as we zoom through midtown Manhattan. It is lunchtime, and the streets are swarming with business folk — attorneys with lattes, analysts with take-out sushi. For Romney, this is a glimpse of his old world, a world of mergers, acquisitions, and Harvard Business School lingo.

His new world, one of big ideas and presidential aspirations, sits on his lap, in the form of his latest book, No Apology: The Case for American Greatness.

Romney knows how to use his time in the wilderness. Unlike many of his potential Republican foes for the 2012 presidential nomination, Romney has kept a relatively low profile since ending his 2008 primary campaign.

No television show, no drama for the former Massachusetts governor.

Instead, Romney is laser-focused on electing state and federal Republican candidates in the midterm elections.

That strategy is paying off. In January, Scott Brown, the Bay State’s new GOP senator, credited Romney as being instrumental to his come-from-behind win. Elsewhere, Romney’s political-action committee, Free and Strong America, has donated over $120,000 to Republican candidates over the past year. Last month, he went so far as to defend former president George W. Bush, his party’s battered hero, in a speech at a conservative conference. All of these efforts, and his book, are signals to the GOP faithful that a certain former governor is tanned, rested, and ready.

GETTING TO THE POINT

The release of No Apology has garnered Romney numerous lighthearted television appearances, from The View to The Late Show with David Letterman. The buzz is nice, he says, “and a lot of fun,” but not his purpose. The will-he, won’t-he presidential chatter misses the point as well.

Americans, he explains, do not want to hear horse-race chatter, but desire, strongly, a real and substantive policy debate, be it about geopolitics or domestic policy. No Apology — a 324-page Romney vade mecum chock-full of policy talk, data, charts, anecdotes, quotes, and arguments — is, in his eyes, a step in that direction. It covers a few key policy areas: 100 pages on America’s role in the world, plus chapters on health care, fiscal policy, education, and “the culture of citizenship.”

“I have wanted to write something like this for about 20 years,” Romney says.” He jokes that he “became unemployed unexpectedly” and, “with a little time on my hands,” told himself that “this is the time to do it.”

Developing his book’s theme was easy. “When I was in the private sector, doing business around the world, I became concerned that Americans were not seeing what was happening around the world,” Romney says. “We think of ourselves as being light years ahead of other nations, and that was the case when I was going around the world in the 1960s. But today that is no longer the case. There are other parts of the world that are eclipsing us in terms of productivity, infrastructure, investment in higher education, and technology. Unless we change course, I’m very concerned that America is going to be eclipsed by some of those other nations. So I wanted to tell this story.”Read more at NRO

O’Connor: Is Nancy Pelosi radioactive or retiring?

March 8th, 2010

By Colleen O’Connor

Who can forget the images?

Just over a year ago.

Hillary Clinton, defeated in her quest to become the first woman elected President of the U.S.— returning to the U.S. Senate for an agonizing and awkward reunion with her colleagues — and suffering the embrace of Sen. Ted Kennedy, who endorsed the young, inexperienced, junior Senator from Illinois, Barack Obama.

Two years earlier, Nancy Pelosi — triumphant in her quest to become the first woman Speaker of the House — smiled broadly, as she lifted the ceremonial gavel into the air, and surrounded herself with a podium full of Members’ children and grandchildren.

The Democratic House roared its approval for a woman who promised to “drain the swamp” of corruption and return “transparency” to the legislative process.

In fact, she promised to deliver the “most ethical Congress” in history.

Pelosi and Clinton: the iconic, and contrasting images of powerful women in victory and defeat.

That didn’t last long.

Read more at SDNN.com

Related Listening: Colleen O’Connor interview Solid Principles Podcast 19

Obama to Dems on Health Care Bill: “Trust Me”

March 8th, 2010

Below is brief excerpt from Politico’s ” The Huddle”, commenting on Obama’s health care bill quandry. Since he can’t close the sale on this over priced clunker, he has resorted to the saleman’s “desperation close”…..”trust me.”

~~John Cronin~~

POTUS KNOWS THE PLAYERS WITHOUT A SCORECARD

The president’s making the full sales pitch to Democratic members of Congress and “instructing aides to address every question or concern Democratic lawmakers possibly can raise,” according to AP’s Chuck Babington.

“Some answers, however, rely more on faith than fact. Confronting party unrest on his left and right, Obama is calling for political courage, citing historic opportunities and essentially saying ‘trust me’ in areas inherently murky, uncertain and out of his control. The process for getting health care legislation through Congress is tough enough already, and Republicans are determined to derail it.”

GOP SEES CAMPAIGN EDGE

POLITICO’s Morning Score snags a memo from the National Republican Congressional Committee’s deputy executive director Johnny DeStefano that instructs GOP hopefuls to tie their opponents to unpopular provisions in the bill.

“Candidates should be aware that although the Senate health care bill – the bill currently being pushed by Democrat leaders – is not the same as last fall’s $1.2 trillion health care takeover passed by the House, it is no less egregious. In addition to the broad political toxicity of the Democrats’ health care agenda, a vote for this bill opens an entirely new line of attack on House Democrats. By supporting this bill, your opponent would go on record in support of the Cornhusker Kickback, the Louisiana Purchase, and every other backroom deal cut to sneak the legislation through the Senate.”

Read More at Politico

CRA Endorses Poizner & DeVore

March 7th, 2010

The California Republican Assembly Convention has just completed, with it comes the endorsements for the 2010 Mid-Terms & Gubernatorial Race.


US Senate
Chuck DeVore

Governor
Steve Poizner

Board of Equalization, District 2
George Runner

Board of Equalization, District 3
Michelle Steel

Lieutenant Governor
Sam Aanestad

Secretary of State
Damon Dunn

Controller
Tony Strickland

Treasurer
Mimi Walters

Attorney General
John Eastman

Insurance Commissioner
No Endorsement

Superintendent of Public Instruction
Diane Lenning

It took 2/3 to endorse.  Governor and BOE District 2 took two rounds while Superintendent of .  Here’s how the votes went down:

US Senate
Chuck DeVore 194 – 68.6%
Carly Fiorina 89 – 31.4%

Governor (Round 1)
Steve Poizner 176 – 63.8%
Meg Whitman 66 – 23.9%
Larry Naritelli 34 – 12.3%

Governor (Round 2)
Steve Poizner 178 – 79.1%
Meg Whitman 47 – 20.9%

Board of Equalization, District 2 (Round 1)
George Runner 176 – 63.8%
Barbara Alby 94 – 34.1%
Alan Nakanishi 6 – 2.2%

Board of Equalization, District 2 (Round 2)
George Runner 152 – 67.6%
Barbara Alby 73 – 32.4%

Lieutenant Governor
Sam Aanestad 247 – 96.5%
Abel Maldonado 9 – 3.5%

Secretary of State
Damon Dunn 193 – 81.1%
Orly Taitz 45 – 18.9%

Controller; Treasurer; Board of Equalization, District 3
Unanimous for Tony Strickland, Mimi Walters, and Michelle Steel, respectively

Attorney General
John Eastman 197 – 80.4%
Tom Harman 40 – 16.3%
Steve Cooley 8 – 3.3%

Insurance Commissioner
No one sought the endorsement

Superintendent of Public Instruction (Round 1)
Diane Lenning 116 – 46.7%
Alexia Deligianni 76 – 30.8%
Lydia Gutierrez 55 – 22.3%

Superintendent of Public Instruction (Round 2)
Diane Lenning 121 – 65.1%
Alexia Deligianni 65 – 34.9%

Superintendent of Public Instruction (Round 3)
Diane Lenning 130 – 71.4%
Alexia Deligianni 52 – 28.6%

Read More at redcounty.com

Further Listening: Chuck DeVore Interview – Solid Principles Podcast 10

Further Listening: Diane Lenning InterviewSolid Principles Podcast 7

Colleen O’Connor: Meg Whitman could win

March 7th, 2010


[Editor's note:  This column was written June 2009.  It is as up to date in it's analysis as if it was written this weekend]

By:  Colleen O’Connor

Few believe that any Republican can win the governorship of one of the country’s most dependably Democratic states—California.

I beg to differ. It could happen.

Everything seems to be in the Democrats favor;
• Lopsided party registration; ( 44.6 percent = Democrats; 31.1 percent = Republicans, 20 percent = Declines to State; and 4.4 percent = Other , i.e., American Independent and Green Parties);
• Seasoned political talent for contenders (San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, Attorney General and former Governor Jerry Brown, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigoso;
• Dominance in the state legislature; (both controlled by Democratic majorities);
• A popular President Obama; a legendary fundraiser at the helm of the state party apparatus (former Representative and State Senator, John Burton) as well as home to House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi.

How much more political firepower can one party have?

How can the Democrats possibly lose to a Republican newcomer like Meg Whitman?

And who is she, anyway?

Whitman is the former CEO of the on-line auction site, eBAY. She is herself, New York-born, Princeton and Harvard educated, a billionaire, 52 years of age, and currently the recipient of flattering stories in several business news magazines. She is the protégé of former Republican Presidential candidate and Massachusetts Governor, Mitt Romney, and a campaign adviser to Republican Presidential nominee, John McCain—both of whom have already endorsed her, thereby almost clearing the field of all but one other billionaire primary opponent.

So, she has the Republican heavyweights supporting her bid, enough personal income to fund her own campaign, and some training time on the campaign trail.

Jerry Brown takes her seriously enough to ridicule her campaign as, “I ran a business. I can buy a campaign. I have zero experience in government. I want to take on the most difficult state job in America. Therefore, make me governor.’ That’s her campaign,” he says.

As a Jeffersonian Republican, (”that government governs best that governs least”), Whitman wants to “run California like a business” — hardly new. However, she opposed all of Schwarzenegger’s ballot budget propositions, thus siding with the popular outcome.

Still, how does she win the governorship?

Easy. Gov. Schwarzenegger can win it for her.

As Schwarzenegger continues to propose hugely unpopular, even if necessary, cuts to the state budget, the seething anger among all classes of the electorate will be primed for another recall election. High-pitched squabbling over a seemingly intractable budget has most of California’s voters on edge. Add more job losses, plant closings, and falling state revenues, and the stew thickens. The Republicans sense this.

In fact, five recall petitions against the Governor have already been registered with the California Secretary of State’s office. Money and misery love petition signings.

Together they may produce an encore performance of our last recall election—the one that ousted the unpopular Democratic Governor, Gray Davis, and elected the Republican Governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger,—with less than 50 percent of the vote.

In a recall scenario, the electorate only needs a majority of “YES” votes to oust the current Governor, and a simple plurality of votes for a candidate to get elected!

Put simply, if all the current candidates stay in the race on the Democratic side (a serious possibility) and the only woman and Republican candidate is Meg Whitman (also a very real possibility), she only needs approximately 38 percent of likely voters to win!

Ironically, the key to a Republican victory for Meg Whitman, is an instant replay of Schwarzenegger’s original win.

Republicans are shrewd enough chess players to attempt this checkmate move again. As long as the Democrats are preoccupied fighting The Terminator and his budget cuts, while battling on behalf of their constituents who about to lose their state funding, the Republicans are free to gather petition signatures, and try another stealth win in an otherwise difficult state.

Add to this dynamic, the rising tide of “independent” voters, Ms. Whitman’s appeal to women (many of whom are still irritated at the rather shabby treatment of both Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin, and want some history making news of their own) and you can easily put together a perfect storm that leads to Meg Whitman occupying the Governor’s mansion.

Read Complete Article at SDNN.com

Related Listening: Colleen O’Connor interview Solid Principles Podcast 19

In Memory of Mark Linkous

March 7th, 2010

Solid Principles may be focused on Politics but at times our blog gives way to our self indulgence, be it football or music.  Ask me about music I will talk your ear off, and out of the hundreds of bands I listen to, I have always enjoyed Mark Linkous, A.k.a: Sparklehorse.   It was sad to hear, but Mark is no longer with us as of this weekend.

Please enjoy this song and his music.

Craig Edwards

It’s A Wonderful Life – Sparkl…

Hulu’s big problem: No loyalty

March 7th, 2010

As the Daily Show and Colbert Report leave Hulu, they reveal the video streaming site’s greatest weakness.

By Chris Gaylord

Next week, The Daily Show and The Colbert Report, two of the most watched shows on Hulu, will be pulled from the website’s video library.

Fans have until Tuesday, March 9, to watch these and other Comedy Central shows before they disappear from Hulu. Reruns will still exist online, but only through the cable network’s official sites, TheDailyShow.com and ColbertNation.com.

This departure will probably cause only a small dip in traffic. Hulu’s audience has grown steadily for some time now, with 1 billion video views a month – second only to YouTube.

But the Comedy Central announcement highlights an enduring problem for Hulu: loyalty.

Read Complete Article at csmonitor.com

Locals Ask Lewis to Support Immigration Bill

March 7th, 2010

By: Joy Juedes

REDLANDS - Dee Barrow waved to drivers from a lawnchair on San Mateo Street. Some honked or called in support.

“We can’t be in D.C. but we wanted to do something,” said Barrow, who lives in Upland. She wore an American flag baseball cap, earrings and necklace, and attached a flag to her chair.

She and several others stood at San Mateo and Brookside Avenue with flags and signs Friday afternoon. They asked passers-by to sign a petition asking Rep. Jerry Lewis to support HR 1026, legislation that would crack down on illegal immigration.

“We want them to know we’re not just sitting here waiting for them to pass a bill,” Barrow said.

The group brought the petition to Lewis’s Brookside Avenue office later Friday. About 100 signatures were collected, organizer Raymond Herrera said Saturday. He said Lewis’s staff said they would give him the petition, and he planned to call Lewis at his Washington office Saturday.

“What we’re asking is for Congressman Jerry Lewis to stand with his constituents,” said Herrera, founder of We the People, California’s Crusader, a Claremont-based grassroots group that organized the demonstration.

“The congressman always welcomes hearing from his constituents on any issue,” Jim Specht, Lewis’s deputy chief of staff, wrote in an e-mail from Washington, D.C.

“Congressman Lewis is opposed to considering legislation that would grant amnesty or other legalization of illegal immigrants at this time because Congress has not addressed the need to secure the border and to develop systems that will stop illegal immigration in the future,” he wrote.

“However, he has never been a supporter of Congress passing legislation that tells Congress what it can’t do.”

The resolution currently has 57 supporters and needs more than 200 by June to be voted on, Herrera said. It would require businesses to enforce immigration law, make E-Verify mandatory, strengthen border security and offer no amnesty to illegal immigrants.

E-Verify is an Internet-based system that allows an employer to see if an employee is eligible to work in the United States.

Herrera said the group is giving Lewis 30 days to support the resolution.

“If he doesn’t sign we’ll pass out fliers to his constituents in supermarkets and parks,” he said.

If Lewis does not support it, he will not receive votes in November, Herrera said.

“The American people want deportation, so there is no compromise on this,” he said.

The group will also “demand” President Obama enforce the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, he said. The law requires “legalization of undocumented aliens who had been continuously unlawfully present since 1982, legalization of certain agricultural workers, sanctions for employers who knowingly hire undocumented workers, and increased enforcement at U.S. borders,” according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

Demonstration organizer Robin Hvidston said the group was receiving positive responses from passers-by. Many who stopped signed the petition.

“We are thinking as many as 70 percent of his constituents want him to sign this bill,” Hvidston said.

Volunteers came and went, most holding signs that said “Hire Americans,” “Stop Illegal Immigration” and “Support American Workers.”

“We love our country and don’t want to see it go down,” said volunteer Don Schenck of Corona.

Herrera led an immigration reform demonstration at Lewis’s office in June. He said We the People held demonstrations Friday in Arizona, New Jersey and Illinois, and all members of Congress will be asked to support the legislation.

HR 1026 was introduced Jan. 21 by Rep. Jason Chaffetz, a Utah Republican.

Specht said Lewis is co-sponsoring HR 19, which would expand the E-Verify program and make it mandatory. He supported Rep. Ken Calvert’s effort last year to attach that legislation to the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill. The bill did not pass.

Specht said Lewis worked with former Rep. Duncan Hunter to pass the Secure Fence Act in 2006 by accepting it as an amendment to the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill. Lewis has supported $1.2 billion in spending in appropriations bills to build at least 700 miles of the fence, Specht wrote.

Read Complete Article at redlandsdailyfacts.com

Conservative Kids with Nerf Guns

March 7th, 2010

This video comes from ConservativeNewMedia, I’m opening this video up for comments for you all, the phone lines are now open.

Craig Edwards

Recent Podcasts

March 7th, 2010

If you are a new reader of Solid Principles, we would like to recommend our most recent Podcasts for your listening pleasure.  Complete back editions are available on our home page and at iTunes.

Episode 24: Melting Waxman: Ari David is indeed a rare breed. A Hollywood conservative taking upon himself the difficult task of challenging Henry Waxman this November. As members of ‘Generation X’ are now entering the political arena, Ari David is proving the children of the ‘Baby Boomers’ are now yawning defiantly at the tired Liberal dogma coming from Washington D.C. Could this unthinkable mix of decades old cynicism, and a steady diet of pop culture possibly change Washington and in turn America?

Episode 23: The Jackie Mason Interview, There is not much more you can say about Jackie Mason, that hasn’t already been said before. What continues to shine through, is Jackie’s sheer bravery. While others are gaged by political correctness, Mason continually speaks with courage what is accurately on everyone’s heart and mind. Solid Principles was privileged to have a short audience, with the man himself.

Episode 22: Tea Party for Sale, What originally served as an outlet for Government anger, has now given way to commercialism, and opportunism. An expensive Tea Party Convention with a six figure speaker fee for Sarah Palin, and the Republican Party now viewing Tea Party supporters as potential recruits. So how exactly did the Tea Party reach this point? Solid Principles spoke to Dale Robertson, the founder of teaparty.org to find out why.

Episode 21: IF YOU ARE GOING TO ‘TAKE BACK’ SAN FRANCISCO, BE SURE TO VOTE OUT PELOSI: One of the more overlooked congressional races in the 2010 Mid-Terms is the 8th Congressional District of California, the home of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. On this edition, Solid Principles speaks with Republican entrepreneur John Dennis the man challenging Speaker Pelosi.

Episode 20: Government Motors Redux: During it’s first year in office, the Obama Administration repeatedly used the subject of TARP to stir up public anger towards the financial sector. Other recipients also receiving TARP funds included General Motors & Chrysler, both of which escaped the long running campaign of TARP resentment. On this edition, Solid Principles revisits the saga of Government Motors. We track the status of these ‘bailed out automakers’ with Karl Brauer, Editor In Chief at Edmunds.com.

Credit Where Credit Isn’t Due

March 7th, 2010

JONAH GOLDBERG
Who gets to claim responsibility for success in Iraq? Joe Biden?

Victory has a hundred fathers,” John F. Kennedy said, “and defeat is an orphan.”

By that standard, George W. Bush has won the Iraq war.

Last month, Vice President Joe Biden proclaimed on CNN’s Larry King Live that the peaceful transition to democracy and the (partial) withdrawal of U.S. forces “could be one of the great achievements of this administration.”

Initially, I ignored Biden’s comment because, well, he’s Joe Biden. As critical as I may be of the Obama administration, holding it accountable for Biden’s mouth seems grotesquely unfair.

But then White House spokesman Robert Gibbs defended the vice president, suggesting that it was Obama who put Iraq “back together” and worked out bringing American troops home.

Read Complete Article at NRO

Wanted: short, fat white man to succeed Barack Obama

March 7th, 2010

I wanted to repost this article from the British paper The Telegraph.Co.Uk because I thought it was an interesting take on our political situation from a European point of view. I am most assuredly not endorsing the opinion that our next American President be white, short, bald or any other physical characteristic.

Competent? Oh, yes. Conservative? Please.

~~John Cronin~~

As the glamour of Barack Obama fades, Americans are likely to turn to entirely different presidential candidates next time, argues Toby Harnden in Washington.

Toby Harnden’s American Way

You could call it the revenge of the ugly white guys. After electing a handsome sleek, biracial – and untested – man as President last time, Americans may well be ready for something entirely different in 2012.
Remember that you heard it here first: make way for the short, pudgy, balding white fellow who’s been there and got the scars – and the results – to prove it.
In many respects, Barack Obama was the ultimate candidate for the television age. He looked fantastic and sounded wonderful. He soared above politics and made people feel better about themselves.

Ability to get things done? Track record? Such petty considerations seemed beside the point in 2008 for Obama was the very culmination of history. It was almost as if the then Senator for Illinois symbolised the end of politics, the point at which the perfect candidate drew a line under grubby partisanship.

Now, Americans have woken up from that dream and are living with the hangover. Neither history nor politics ended when Obama’s ascended to the Oval Office. The recession is biting, unemployment is still hovering just below 10 per cent, the deficit is soaring and there is still gridlock in Washington.

Having elected two Senators as President and Vice-President for the first time since 1960, Americans are likely to look once again towards the more traditional stable for commanders-in-chief – the governor’s mansions.

As the Republican challengers to Obama begin to prepare the ground for their 2012 runs, two hitherto unlikely potential candidates are gaining support among party insiders.

Before Obama, neither would have had a prayer. Mitch Daniels, described by the “Washington Post” as Indiana’s “diminutive governor” sports what looks suspiciously like a combover.

He’s the kind of geek who seemed straight from central casting as head of the Office of Management and Budget under President George W. Bush when I interviewed him in 2001.

In what Americans for some unfathomable reason refer to as “the Hoosier state”, Daniels has been a quiet star, securing bipartisan support for a Healthy Indiana programme Indiana that provides health insurance for blue collar workers, cutting property taxes and turning an $800 billion deficit into a surplus.Daniels remarked to Ross Douthat of the New York Times that “I’ve never seen a president of the United States when I look in the mirror” (which instantly sets himself apart from all 100 Senators). Douthat duly noted that Daniels would be the baldest President since Dwight Eisenhower, who left office in 1961.

Haley Barbour has more hair than Daniels but isn’t much taller and if elected would be the most portly president since William Howard Taft, who occupied the White House from 1909 to 1913.

The Mississippi governor has a certain rumpled panache and Southern charm. I first bumped into him in a casino in his home state – where he later came to personify executive competence as he dealt masterfully with the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina while neighbouring Louisiana lurched towards catastrophe.

Barbour – who has a political brain second to none – has always been dismissed as a possible presidential contender. That’s partly because he has the perfect face for radio but also because he was a big-time lobbyist in Washington whose firm represented the tobacco industry.

But while Obama sanctimoniously instituted grand new rules to ban lobbyists from his administration and then immediately granted himself exceptions, at least with Barbour is up front about things. So could he really have a tilt at the White House? The door is ajar. “If you see me losing 40 pounds that means I’m either running or have cancer,” he quipped a fortnight ago..

All this could be a problem for the likes of Mitt Romney – a.k.a.
“Matinee Mitt” -
the buff, chiselled-jawed hunk who has not stopped running for President full-time since he lost out in 2008. And for Sarah Palin, who would be a celebrity candidate seeking to oust a celebrity president if she was pitted against Obama.

It might even make John McCain, who used to describe himself as “older than dirt, more scars than Frankenstein” when he was running against Obama, wonder whether he should resurrect that combover from the 1980s and have another go next time.I’m not going to predict who’ll succeed Obama. But I’ll wager it will be someone whiter, shorter, uglier, fatter and balder who won’t be able to deliver half as good a speech as the current commander-in-chief can.

Read More at telegraph.co.uk